Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGKPX vs HBLAX
GGKPX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GGKPX vs HBLAX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder P
Price$26.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.58B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.89B
GGKPX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGKPX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGKPX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.9B vs. GGKPX (2.58B). GGKPX pays higher dividends than HBLAX: GGKPX (4.33) vs HBLAX (3.35). GGKPX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GGKPX (7 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). HBLAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than GGKPX (0.62). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GGKPX (30.00). GGKPX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: GGKPX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). GGKPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.41 vs. HBLAX (5.77). GGKPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.30 vs. HBLAX (17.94).
| GGKPX | HBLAX | GGKPX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.89 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.89 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.827 | 5.542 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 2000 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.58B | 11.9B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.33 | 3.35 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.41 | 5.77 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.64 | 16.00 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.30 | 17.94 | 214% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.66 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement