Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGLPX vs NHMFX
GGLPX vs NHMFX Comparison
Open Charts GGLPX vs NHMFX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Muni P
Price$8.91
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.69B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond R6
Price$14.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
GGLPX vs NHMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGLPX vs. NHMFX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLPX is a Hold and NHMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMFX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. GGLPX (11.7B). NHMFX pays higher dividends than GGLPX: NHMFX (5.67) vs GGLPX (4.61). GGLPX was incepted earlier than NHMFX: GGLPX (7 years) vs NHMFX (9 years). NHMFX (1.87) is less costly to investors than GGLPX (0.55). GGLPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. NHMFX (18.00). GGLPX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMFX: GGLPX (0) vs NHMFX (1000000). GGLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.70 vs. NHMFX (-3.21). GGLPX return over 5 years is better than : 8.15 vs. NHMFX (7.51).
| GGLPX | NHMFX | GGLPX / NHMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 1.87 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.87 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.060 | -3.341 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 13.4B | 87% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.61 | 5.67 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.70 | -3.21 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.59 | 7.85 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.15 | 7.51 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement