GGLXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
PMNXF
Price
$1.74
Change
-$0.06 (-3.33%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

GGLXF vs PMNXF

Header iconGGLXF vs PMNXF Comparison
Open Charts GGLXF vs PMNXFBanner chart's image
GGL Resources
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
Perseus Mining
Price$1.74
Change-$0.06 (-3.33%)
Volume$280
CapitalizationN/A
GGLXF vs PMNXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GGLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGLXF vs. PMNXF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGLXF is a Hold and PMNXF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GGLXF: $0.01 vs. PMNXF: $1.74)
Brand notoriety: GGLXF and PMNXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGLXF: 196% vs. PMNXF: 4%
Market capitalization -- GGLXF: $3.55M vs. PMNXF: $1.62B
GGLXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.55M. PMNXF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMNXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GGLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMNXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMNXF is a better buy in the long-term than GGLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GGLXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMNXF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GGLXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PMNXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GGLXF is a better buy in the short-term than PMNXF.

Price Growth

GGLXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMNXF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMNXF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than GGLXF($3.55M). PMNXF YTD gains are higher at: 37.008 vs. GGLXF (-22.293). PMNXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. GGLXF (-405.46K). PMNXF has more cash in the bank: 218M vs. GGLXF (1.58M). GGLXF has less debt than PMNXF: GGLXF (60K) vs PMNXF (219M). PMNXF has higher revenues than GGLXF: PMNXF (1.25B) vs GGLXF (0).
GGLXFPMNXFGGLXF / PMNXF
Capitalization3.55M1.62B0%
EBITDA-405.46K634M-0%
Gain YTD-22.29337.008-60%
P/E RatioN/A7.82-
Revenue01.25B-
Total Cash1.58M218M1%
Total Debt60K219M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGLXF vs PMNXF: Fundamental Ratings
GGLXF
PMNXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10016
SMR RATING
1..100
9146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6545
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
246
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PMNXF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLXF (83). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GGLXF (100). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew significantly faster than GGLXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's SMR Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GGLXF (91). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GGLXF’s over the last 12 months.

PMNXF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as GGLXF (65). This means that PMNXF’s stock grew similarly to GGLXF’s over the last 12 months.

GGLXF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMNXF (46). This means that GGLXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMNXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GGLXFPMNXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GGLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMNXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLCRX29.66N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R
RIOAX10.49N/A
N/A
RBC International Opportunities A
PIGDX14.94-0.03
-0.20%
Federated Hermes International Growth IS
ASQCX14.79-0.21
-1.40%
American Century Small Company C
ATHWX20.10-3.94
-16.39%
American Century Heritage R

GGLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGLXF has been loosely correlated with BBSRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGLXF jumps, then BBSRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGLXF
1D Price
Change %
GGLXF100%
N/A
BBSRF - GGLXF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
PNGZF - GGLXF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PMNXF - GGLXF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GFGSF - GGLXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.80%
GGXXF - GGLXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PMNXF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PMNXF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMNXF
1D Price
Change %
PMNXF100%
N/A
AEM - PMNXF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
CDE - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.16%
MAG - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
NGD - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
BTG - PMNXF
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More