Ad is loading...
GGRCX vs RGAFX
GGRCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGAFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$14.78
Change-$0.53 (-3.46%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$74.83
Change-$9.91 (-11.69%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GGRCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a StrongBuy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 313B vs. GGRCX (208M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGAFX (0.73) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAFX (31.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGAFX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.71 vs. RGAFX (19.53). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.15 vs. GGRCX (1.31).
| GGRCX | RGAFX | GGRCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.846 | 19.280 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 208M | 313B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.71 | 19.53 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.14 | 5.93 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.31 | 49.15 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.13 | 77.57 | -65% |