Ad is loading...
GGRCX vs RGAFX
GGRCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts GGRCX vs RGAFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth C
Price$13.28
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.44M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$69.76
Change+$0.08 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.85B
GGRCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGRCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGRCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 276B vs. GGRCX (175M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than GGRCX: RGAFX (0.62) vs GGRCX (0.00). GGRCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: GGRCX (26 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). GGRCX (2.07) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). GGRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GGRCX: RGAFX (250) vs GGRCX (1000). GGRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.08 vs. RGAFX (1.54). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 72.29 vs. GGRCX (6.76).
| GGRCX | RGAFX | GGRCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 0.34 | 524% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.07 | 0.34 | 609% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.163 | -6.262 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 175M | 276B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 1.54 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.62 | 17.85 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.76 | 72.29 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -57.66 | 62.43 | -92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...