GGTHF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
1.71M
LZM
Price
$3.40
Change
-$0.07 (-2.02%)
Updated
Apr 29, 02:35 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
627.96M
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GGTHF vs LZM

Header iconGGTHF vs LZM Comparison
Open Charts GGTHF vs LZMBanner chart's image
Golden Goliath Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$464
Capitalization1.71M
Lifezone Metals
Price$3.40
Change-$0.07 (-2.02%)
Volume$239
Capitalization627.96M
GGTHF vs LZM Comparison Chart
Loading...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GGTHF vs. LZM commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGTHF is a Hold and LZM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (GGTHF: $0.06 vs. LZM: $3.47)
Brand notoriety: GGTHF and LZM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GGTHF: 11% vs. LZM: 61%
Market capitalization -- GGTHF: $1.71M vs. LZM: $627.96M
GGTHF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.71M. LZM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $627.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GGTHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GGTHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGTHF is a better buy in the long-term than LZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LZM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LZM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GGTHF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LZM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

LZM is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.25% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LZM($628M) has a higher market cap than GGTHF($1.71M). GGTHF YTD gains are higher at: 242.857 vs. LZM (-50.072). GGTHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -538.82K vs. LZM (-32.95M). LZM has more cash in the bank: 44.4M vs. GGTHF (430K). LZM has higher revenues than GGTHF: LZM (2.32M) vs GGTHF (0).
GGTHFLZMGGTHF / LZM
Capitalization1.71M628M0%
EBITDA-538.82K-32.95M2%
Gain YTD242.857-50.072-485%
P/E RatioN/A1250.00-
Revenue02.32M-
Total Cash430K44.4M1%
Total DebtN/A496K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GGTHF: Fundamental Ratings
GGTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LZM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALLIX100.61N/A
N/A
AB Large Cap Growth I
FFGAX18.12N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk A
PNSAX66.86N/A
N/A
Putnam Small Cap Growth A
DRLYX8.17N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - Y
SCREX35.16N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Rl Estt R6

GGTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GGTHF and BKIRF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GGTHF and BKIRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGTHF
1D Price
Change %
GGTHF100%
N/A
BKIRF - GGTHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LZM - GGTHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.93%
DTWOF - GGTHF
9%
Poorly correlated
+102.43%
BLIDF - GGTHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLIBF - GGTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LZM has been loosely correlated with MTAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LZM jumps, then MTAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LZM
1D Price
Change %
LZM100%
-4.93%
MTAL - LZM
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.05%
FCX - LZM
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
TECK - LZM
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
HBM - LZM
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRN - LZM
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
More