Ad is loading...
GGZPX vs RWMEX
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMEX
Goldman Sachs Enh Cor EqFund-ShareclassP
Price$20.34
Change-$1.08 (-5.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets400.73M
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$59.15
Change-$2.27 (-3.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.67B
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMEX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 188B vs. GGZPX (401M). RWMEX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMEX (1.26) vs GGZPX (0.61). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMEX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.61). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMEX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMEX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMEX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. RWMEX (1.85). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 109.43 vs. RWMEX (77.82).
| GGZPX | RWMEX | GGZPX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.61 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.61 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.332 | 0.884 | -490% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 188B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.26 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 1.85 | 308% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.81 | 7.69 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | 109.43 | 77.82 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...