Ad is loading...
GGZPX vs RWMEX
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMEX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$21.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets426.01M
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$61.15
Change-$0.16 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets186.07B
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMEX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. GGZPX (426M). RWMEX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMEX (1.27) vs GGZPX (0.61). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMEX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.61). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMEX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMEX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMEX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. RWMEX (1.62). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 76.36 vs. RWMEX (53.60).
| GGZPX | RWMEX | GGZPX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.61 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.61 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.556 | 0.441 | -1,033% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 186B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.27 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.86 | 1.62 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.87 | 16.66 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.36 | 53.60 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 56.42 | - |