Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWMEX
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMEX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$23.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets456.11M
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$63.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.69B
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMEX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 201B vs. GGZPX (456M). RWMEX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMEX (1.21) vs GGZPX (0.55). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMEX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMEX (29.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMEX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMEX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.95 vs. RWMEX (4.34). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 74.11 vs. RWMEX (50.28).
| GGZPX | RWMEX | GGZPX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.60 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.60 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.377 | 5.346 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 201B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 1.21 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.95 | 4.34 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.49 | 31.30 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.11 | 50.28 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.38 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers