Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GGZPX vs RWMEX
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts GGZPX vs RWMEX
Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity P
Price$23.01
Change+$0.17 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets443.78M
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$62.69
Change+$0.55 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets196.28B
GGZPX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GGZPX vs. RWMEX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GGZPX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 196B vs. GGZPX (444M). RWMEX pays higher dividends than GGZPX: RWMEX (1.21) vs GGZPX (0.58). GGZPX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: GGZPX (7 years) vs RWMEX (23 years). GGZPX (0.88) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.61). GGZPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RWMEX (31.00). GGZPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMEX: GGZPX (0) vs RWMEX (250). GGZPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.91 vs. RWMEX (5.99). GGZPX return over 5 years is better than : 82.33 vs. RWMEX (56.53).
| GGZPX | RWMEX | GGZPX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.61 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.61 | 144% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.010 | 3.287 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 196B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.21 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 5.99 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.05 | 26.77 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.33 | 56.53 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 65.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement