GH vs TDS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GH is a Buy and TDS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTDS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TDS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TDS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GH (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -5.43% price change this week, while TDS (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +6.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.17%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
GH is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
TDS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Specialties (+0.94% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
@Wireless Telecommunications (+0.79% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| GH | TDS | GH / TDS | |
| Capitalization | 2.47B | 1.81B | 136% |
| EBITDA | -433.3M | 682M | -64% |
| Gain YTD | 36.563 | 1.494 | 2,447% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.15 | - |
| Revenue | 564M | 5.16B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 1.17B | 236M | 495% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 5.14B | 26% |
GH | TDS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GH's Valuation (67) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as TDS (87) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to TDS’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew significantly faster than GH’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's SMR Rating (90) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is in the same range as GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew similarly to GH’s over the last 12 months.
GH's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as TDS (46) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry. This means that GH’s stock grew similarly to TDS’s over the last 12 months.
TDS's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Wireless Telecommunications industry is significantly better than the same rating for GH (100) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry. This means that TDS’s stock grew significantly faster than GH’s over the last 12 months.
| GH | TDS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 76% |
GH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GH has been loosely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GH jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
TDS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDS has been closely correlated with USM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDS jumps, then USM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDS | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| USM - TDS | 87% Closely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| LBTYA - TDS | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SHEN - TDS | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.62% | ||
| CMCSA - TDS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| TELNY - TDS | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||