GHYG | SPHY | GHYG / SPHY | |
Gain YTD | 1.166 | -0.212 | -551% |
Net Assets | 160M | 7.82B | 2% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.05 | 800% |
Turnover | 27.00 | 32.00 | 84% |
Yield | 6.07 | 7.76 | 78% |
Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
GHYG | SPHY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago65% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 1 day ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago47% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago52% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago52% | 1 day ago52% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago63% | 9 days ago61% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago52% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago66% | 1 day ago64% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago62% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GHYG and SM have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GHYG and SM's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHY has been loosely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SPHY jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SPHY | 100% | +2.59% | ||
BTE - SPHY | 48% Loosely correlated | +21.62% | ||
WFRD - SPHY | 23% Poorly correlated | +17.26% |