Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GINNX vs RPEBX
GINNX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs RPEBX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$59.73
Change+$0.16 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.05M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$65.11
Change+$0.50 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.9B
GINNX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. RPEBX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 149B vs. GINNX (190M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than GINNX: RPEBX (0.13) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: GINNX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than GINNX (1.10). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: RPEBX (250) vs GINNX (100000). RPEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.95 vs. GINNX (-1.89). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.32 vs. GINNX (24.30).
| GINNX | RPEBX | GINNX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.21 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.564 | 7.852 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 149B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.89 | 9.95 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.68 | 27.66 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.30 | 41.32 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.28 | - |