Ad is loading...
GINNX vs RPEBX
GINNX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs RPEBX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$54.78
Change+$1.48 (+2.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.92M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$59.30
Change+$1.13 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
GINNX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. RPEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. GINNX (179M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than GINNX: RPEBX (0.14) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: GINNX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than GINNX (1.13). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. GINNX (8.77). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: RPEBX (250) vs GINNX (100000). RPEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.67 vs. GINNX (-8.23). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.47 vs. GINNX (26.40).
| GINNX | RPEBX | GINNX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.21 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.442 | -1.772 | 363% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.23 | 3.67 | -224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.27 | 10.26 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.40 | 44.47 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.44 | - |