Ad is loading...
GINNX vs RPEBX
GINNX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts GINNX vs RPEBX
Guinness Atkinson™ Global Inntrs Instl
Price$55.43
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets187.59M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$59.81
Change+$0.35 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.47B
GINNX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GINNX vs. RPEBX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GINNX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. GINNX (188M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than GINNX: RPEBX (0.14) vs GINNX (0.00). GINNX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: GINNX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than GINNX (1.13). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. GINNX (8.77). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GINNX: RPEBX (250) vs GINNX (100000). RPEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.29 vs. GINNX (-7.06). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 65.32 vs. GINNX (49.49).
| GINNX | RPEBX | GINNX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.21 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.21 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.230 | -0.928 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.06 | 2.29 | -308% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.40 | 2.65 | -15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.49 | 65.32 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.28 | - |