Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GIRPX vs RNWHX
GIRPX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GIRPX vs RNWHX
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts I
Price$9.88
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.38B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.35
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.39B
GIRPX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GIRPX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GIRPX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.4B vs. GIRPX (2.38B). GIRPX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GIRPX (1.16) vs RNWHX (0.99). GIRPX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GIRPX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). GIRPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 168.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). GIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: GIRPX (0) vs RNWHX (250). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. GIRPX (8.00). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.66 vs. GIRPX (12.22).
| GIRPX | RNWHX | GIRPX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.72 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.634 | 16.219 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 70.4B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 0.99 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.00 | 9.94 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.19 | 40.82 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.22 | 28.66 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.06 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement