GJNSY vs HVRRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GJNSY is a Hold and HVRRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GJNSY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHVRRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GJNSY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HVRRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
GJNSY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.05% price change this week, while HVRRF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -3.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +3.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.24%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+3.98% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| GJNSY | HVRRF | GJNSY / HVRRF | |
| Capitalization | 7.91B | 25.8B | 31% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.621 | -3.389 | -343% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.17 | 16.08 | 94% |
| Revenue | 37.5B | 30.6B | 123% |
| Total Cash | 4.16B | 49B | 8% |
| Total Debt | 3.82B | 5.51B | 69% |
GJNSY | HVRRF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 76 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GJNSY's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVRRF (94). This means that GJNSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVRRF’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (64). This means that HVRRF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (93). This means that HVRRF’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.
GJNSY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as HVRRF (52). This means that GJNSY’s stock grew similarly to HVRRF’s over the last 12 months.
GJNSY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HVRRF (76). This means that GJNSY’s stock grew similarly to HVRRF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TORCX | 19.28 | 0.55 | +2.94% |
| Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR C | |||
| VCNIX | 27.84 | 0.45 | +1.64% |
| VALIC Company I NASDAQ-100 Index | |||
| SPWYX | 14.21 | 0.13 | +0.92% |
| American Beacon Stephens Sm Cp Gr Y | |||
| ABPYX | 12.13 | 0.09 | +0.75% |
| AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port Advisor | |||
| NEWCX | 75.15 | -0.27 | -0.36% |
| American Funds New World C | |||
GJNSY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GJNSY and LMND have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GJNSY and LMND's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GJNSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJNSY | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| LMND - GJNSY | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| HVRRF - GJNSY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GJNSF - GJNSY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HVRRY - GJNSY | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| PLMR - GJNSY | 1% Poorly correlated | +4.95% | ||
More | ||||
HVRRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HVRRF and ALL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVRRF and ALL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HVRRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVRRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALL - HVRRF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| AMIGY - HVRRF | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.39% | ||
| HVRRY - HVRRF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| LMND - HVRRF | 7% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| GJNSY - HVRRF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||