It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GJNSY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHVRRY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HVRRY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
GJNSY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -6.08% price change this week, while HVRRY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.89%.
HVRRY is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
GJNSY | HVRRY | GJNSY / HVRRY | |
Capitalization | 7.91B | 25.8B | 31% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -4.471 | 9.840 | -45% |
P/E Ratio | 15.17 | 16.05 | 95% |
Revenue | 37.5B | 30.6B | 123% |
Total Cash | 4.16B | 49B | 8% |
Total Debt | 3.82B | N/A | - |
GJNSY | HVRRY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 75 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GJNSY's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HVRRY (94). This means that GJNSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HVRRY’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRY's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GJNSY (81). This means that HVRRY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRY's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (93). This means that HVRRY’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (60). This means that HVRRY’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRY's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as GJNSY (76). This means that HVRRY’s stock grew similarly to GJNSY’s over the last 12 months.
HVRRY | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago52% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago35% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago32% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GJNSY and LMND have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GJNSY and LMND's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GJNSY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GJNSY | 100% | -4.90% | ||
LMND - GJNSY | 8% Poorly correlated | +5.01% | ||
HVRRF - GJNSY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
GJNSF - GJNSY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
HVRRY - GJNSY | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
PLMR - GJNSY | 1% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HVRRY has been loosely correlated with MURGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HVRRY jumps, then MURGY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HVRRY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HVRRY | 100% | +0.66% | ||
MURGY - HVRRY | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
SSREY - HVRRY | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
SCRYY - HVRRY | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.26% | ||
EG - HVRRY | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.32% | ||
L - HVRRY | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More |