GLAD
Price
$27.27
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 4, 10:32 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
466.85M
MSDL
Price
$18.42
Change
-$0.13 (-0.70%)
Updated
Aug 4, 10:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLAD vs MSDL

Header iconGLAD vs MSDL Comparison
Open Charts GLAD vs MSDLBanner chart's image
Gladstone Capital
Price$27.27
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$662
Capitalization466.85M
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$18.42
Change-$0.13 (-0.70%)
Volume$820
Capitalization1.92B
GLAD vs MSDL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAD vs. MSDL commentary
Aug 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAD is a Buy and MSDL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAD: $27.27 vs. MSDL: $18.55)
Brand notoriety: GLAD and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAD: 129% vs. MSDL: 156%
Market capitalization -- GLAD: $466.85M vs. MSDL: $1.92B
GLAD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $466.85M. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAD’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMSDL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAD’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the long-term than MSDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSDL is a better buy in the short-term than GLAD.

Price Growth

GLAD (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.92% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAD is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

MSDL is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.88% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.92B) has a higher market cap than GLAD($467M). MSDL has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: MSDL (8.24) vs GLAD (7.34). GLAD YTD gains are higher at: -0.022 vs. MSDL (-5.530). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 88.1M vs. GLAD (9.33M). GLAD has less debt than MSDL: GLAD (338M) vs MSDL (1.5B). MSDL has higher revenues than GLAD: MSDL (257M) vs GLAD (74M).
GLADMSDLGLAD / MSDL
Capitalization467M1.92B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.022-5.5300%
P/E Ratio7.348.2489%
Revenue74M257M29%
Total Cash9.33M88.1M11%
Total Debt338M1.5B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAD: Fundamental Ratings
GLAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLADMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
26%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGHIX35.220.17
+0.49%
Hartford Healthcare I
KNGIX11.44-0.06
-0.52%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc Ins
MEQRX43.85-0.42
-0.95%
MFS Global Equity R2
LGCCX18.45-0.18
-0.97%
Lord Abbett Global Equity C
MSIGX62.32-1.12
-1.77%
Invesco Main Street A

GLAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAD has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLAD jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAD
1D Price
Change %
GLAD100%
-1.16%
MAIN - GLAD
81%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
FDUS - GLAD
80%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
FSK - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
-1.96%
ARCC - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
TSLX - GLAD
75%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
More

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with CSWC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then CSWC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
-0.80%
CSWC - MSDL
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
FSK - MSDL
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
BCSF - MSDL
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
SLRC - MSDL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
GLAD - MSDL
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.16%
More