GLAD
Price
$24.52
Change
+$0.37 (+1.53%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
466.85M
MSDL
Price
$19.21
Change
+$0.09 (+0.47%)
Updated
Apr 15, 10:36 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.92B
23 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GLAD vs MSDL

Header iconGLAD vs MSDL Comparison
Open Charts GLAD vs MSDLBanner chart's image
Gladstone Capital
Price$24.52
Change+$0.37 (+1.53%)
Volume$133.82K
Capitalization466.85M
Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund
Price$19.21
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
Volume$300
Capitalization1.92B
GLAD vs MSDL Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAD vs. MSDL commentary
Apr 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAD is a StrongBuy and MSDL is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 15, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAD: $24.52 vs. MSDL: $19.12)
Brand notoriety: GLAD and MSDL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAD: 113% vs. MSDL: 80%
Market capitalization -- GLAD: $466.85M vs. MSDL: $1.92B
GLAD [@Investment Managers] is valued at $466.85M. MSDL’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMSDL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MSDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the long-term than MSDL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSDL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MSDL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLAD is a better buy in the short-term than MSDL.

Price Growth

GLAD (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.33% price change this week, while MSDL (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAD is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

MSDL is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.76% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSDL($1.92B) has a higher market cap than GLAD($467M). MSDL has higher P/E ratio than GLAD: MSDL (8.24) vs GLAD (7.34). MSDL YTD gains are higher at: -5.160 vs. GLAD (-12.291). MSDL has more cash in the bank: 88.1M vs. GLAD (9.33M). GLAD has less debt than MSDL: GLAD (338M) vs MSDL (1.5B). MSDL has higher revenues than GLAD: MSDL (257M) vs GLAD (74M).
GLADMSDLGLAD / MSDL
Capitalization467M1.92B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.291-5.160238%
P/E Ratio7.348.2489%
Revenue74M257M29%
Total Cash9.33M88.1M11%
Total Debt338M1.5B23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAD: Fundamental Ratings
GLAD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
78
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10
SMR RATING
1..100
14
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLADMSDL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
31%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLAD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSDL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERSGX12.97N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Small-Cap R
ARDGX25.69N/A
N/A
Archer Dividend Growth
VSTCX32.97N/A
N/A
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Inv
HILYX19.48N/A
N/A
Hartford International Value Y
PDEZX15.90N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq Opps Z

GLAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLAD has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLAD jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAD
1D Price
Change %
GLAD100%
+1.53%
MAIN - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
+2.49%
FDUS - GLAD
79%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
ARCC - GLAD
77%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
CSWC - GLAD
72%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
NMFC - GLAD
72%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More

MSDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MSDL has been loosely correlated with BCSF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MSDL jumps, then BCSF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSDL
1D Price
Change %
MSDL100%
+3.35%
BCSF - MSDL
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
CSWC - MSDL
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
ARCC - MSDL
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
SLRC - MSDL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
NMFC - MSDL
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
More