GLAE
Price
$32.00
Change
+$1.00 (+3.23%)
Updated
Dec 30 closing price
Capitalization
226.53K
51 days until earnings call
HRGLF
Price
$14.12
Change
+$1.25 (+9.72%)
Updated
Jan 7 closing price
Capitalization
5.19B
Ad is loading...

GLAE vs HRGLF

Header iconGLAE vs HRGLF Comparison
Open Charts GLAE vs HRGLFBanner chart's image
GlassBridge Enterprises
Price$32.00
Change+$1.00 (+3.23%)
Volume$126
Capitalization226.53K
Hargreaves Lansdown
Price$14.12
Change+$1.25 (+9.72%)
Volume$222
Capitalization5.19B
GLAE vs HRGLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLAE vs. HRGLF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLAE is a Hold and HRGLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (GLAE: $32.00 vs. HRGLF: $14.11)
Brand notoriety: GLAE and HRGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLAE: 306% vs. HRGLF: 42%
Market capitalization -- GLAE: $226.53K vs. HRGLF: $5.19B
GLAE [@Investment Managers] is valued at $226.53K. HRGLF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLAE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHRGLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GLAE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HRGLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HRGLF is a better buy in the long-term than GLAE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLAE’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HRGLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLAE’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HRGLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HRGLF is a better buy in the short-term than GLAE.

Price Growth

GLAE (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HRGLF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLAE is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HRGLF($5.19B) has a higher market cap than GLAE($227K). HRGLF has higher P/E ratio than GLAE: HRGLF (15.02) vs GLAE (0.19). HRGLF YTD gains are higher at: 9.759 vs. GLAE (0.000). HRGLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 331M vs. GLAE (-3M). HRGLF has more cash in the bank: 446M vs. GLAE (600K). GLAE has less debt than HRGLF: GLAE (3.8M) vs HRGLF (14.6M). HRGLF has higher revenues than GLAE: HRGLF (642M) vs GLAE (200K).
GLAEHRGLFGLAE / HRGLF
Capitalization227K5.19B0%
EBITDA-3M331M-1%
Gain YTD0.0009.759-
P/E Ratio0.1915.021%
Revenue200K642M0%
Total Cash600K446M0%
Total Debt3.8M14.6M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLAE vs HRGLF: Fundamental Ratings
GLAE
HRGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9722
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
312
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
39n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLAE's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HRGLF (99). This means that GLAE’s stock grew somewhat faster than HRGLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGLF (100). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to HRGLF’s over the last 12 months.

HRGLF's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLAE (97). This means that HRGLF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLAE’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGLF (44). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to HRGLF’s over the last 12 months.

GLAE's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as HRGLF (12). This means that GLAE’s stock grew similarly to HRGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLAEHRGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLAE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HRGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FACEX15.000.15
+1.01%
Frost Growth Equity Investor
PGELX26.350.18
+0.69%
George Putnam Balanced R5
ACSRX29.770.20
+0.68%
Invesco Comstock R
OVEIX15.310.06
+0.39%
Sterling Capital Mid Value I
FSISX8.120.03
+0.37%
Fidelity SAI International Sm Cp Idx

GLAE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLAE and PX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLAE and PX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLAE
1D Price
Change %
GLAE100%
N/A
PX - GLAE
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
TSLX - GLAE
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBF - GLAE
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
FNNCF - GLAE
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - GLAE
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
More

HRGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HRGLF and WHG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HRGLF and WHG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HRGLF
1D Price
Change %
HRGLF100%
N/A
WHG - HRGLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.84%
HALFF - HRGLF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
HCGI - HRGLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLAE - HRGLF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - HRGLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
More