Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCUX vs RGEBX
GLCUX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLCUX vs RGEBX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$36.38
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.53B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.11
Change-$0.15 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
GLCUX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCUX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCUX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. GLCUX (1.53B). GLCUX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: GLCUX (0.06) vs RGEBX (0.00). GLCUX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GLCUX (10 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than GLCUX (0.58). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: RGEBX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.79 vs. GLCUX (16.48). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.92 vs. GLCUX (-7.49).
| GLCUX | RGEBX | GLCUX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.09 | 50% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.185 | 12.136 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.48 | 20.79 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.81 | 43.03 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.49 | 38.92 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.53 | 76.03 | 77% |