GLDG
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.01 (-1.25%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
161.01M
63 days until earnings call
MAG
Price
$15.96
Change
+$0.73 (+4.79%)
Updated
May 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.12B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GLDG vs MAG

Header iconGLDG vs MAG Comparison
Open Charts GLDG vs MAGBanner chart's image
GoldMining
Price$0.79
Change-$0.01 (-1.25%)
Volume$500
Capitalization161.01M
MAG Silver
Price$15.96
Change+$0.73 (+4.79%)
Volume$9.53K
Capitalization1.12B
GLDG vs MAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDG vs. MAG commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a Hold and MAG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDG: $0.79 vs. MAG: $15.93)
Brand notoriety: GLDG and MAG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDG: 78% vs. MAG: 135%
Market capitalization -- GLDG: $161.01M vs. MAG: $1.12B
GLDG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $161.01M. MAG’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMAG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MAG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the long-term than GLDG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAG’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MAG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MAG is a better buy in the short-term than GLDG.

Price Growth

GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.96% price change this week, while MAG (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLDG is expected to report earnings on Jul 10, 2025.

MAG is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.49% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MAG($1.12B) has a higher market cap than GLDG($161M). MAG has higher P/E ratio than GLDG: MAG (22.98) vs GLDG (1.77). MAG YTD gains are higher at: 13.330 vs. GLDG (-0.708). MAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.89M vs. GLDG (-20.11M). MAG has more cash in the bank: 68.7M vs. GLDG (20.8M). MAG has less debt than GLDG: MAG (154K) vs GLDG (456K). GLDG (0) and MAG (0) have equivalent revenues.
GLDGMAGGLDG / MAG
Capitalization161M1.12B14%
EBITDA-20.11M-13.89M145%
Gain YTD-0.70813.330-5%
P/E Ratio1.7722.988%
Revenue00-
Total Cash20.8M68.7M30%
Total Debt456K154K296%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLDG vs MAG: Fundamental Ratings
GLDG
MAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5619
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10070
SMR RATING
1..100
9249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLDG's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAG (86) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLDG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (100) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's SMR Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (92) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (50) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

MAG's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (84) in the null industry. This means that MAG’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDGMAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDTGX84.76N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
RYAZX171.72N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value H
LIRSX9.03N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value R4
ASVYX9.46N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value Y
TMIRX9.40N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth R

GLDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDG
1D Price
Change %
GLDG100%
-3.68%
HL - GLDG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
PAAS - GLDG
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
AG - GLDG
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.03%
MTA - GLDG
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
CDE - GLDG
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
More