GLDG
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
161.01M
44 days until earnings call
MTA
Price
$2.71
Change
-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
284.03M
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GLDG vs MTA

Header iconGLDG vs MTA Comparison
Open Charts GLDG vs MTABanner chart's image
GoldMining
Price$0.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300.94K
Capitalization161.01M
Metalla Royalty & Streaming
Price$2.71
Change-$0.04 (-1.45%)
Volume$421.06K
Capitalization284.03M
GLDG vs MTA Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDG vs. MTA commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a Hold and MTA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDG: $0.79 vs. MTA: $2.71)
Brand notoriety: GLDG and MTA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDG: 53% vs. MTA: 109%
Market capitalization -- GLDG: $161.01M vs. MTA: $284.03M
GLDG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $161.01M. MTA’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $284.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MTA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLDG is a better buy in the long-term than MTA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTA is a better buy in the short-term than GLDG.

Price Growth

GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.01% price change this week, while MTA (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLDG is expected to report earnings on Apr 09, 2025.

MTA is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.38% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTA($284M) has a higher market cap than GLDG($161M). MTA YTD gains are higher at: 7.968 vs. GLDG (-1.255). MTA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -917K vs. GLDG (-20.11M). GLDG has more cash in the bank: 20.8M vs. MTA (14.1M). GLDG has less debt than MTA: GLDG (456K) vs MTA (14.6M). MTA has higher revenues than GLDG: MTA (4.6M) vs GLDG (0).
GLDGMTAGLDG / MTA
Capitalization161M284M57%
EBITDA-20.11M-917K2,192%
Gain YTD-1.2557.968-16%
P/E Ratio1.77N/A-
Revenue04.6M-
Total Cash20.8M14.1M148%
Total Debt456K14.6M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLDG vs MTA: Fundamental Ratings
GLDG
MTA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
718
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7562
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLDG's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (51). This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

GLDG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (100). This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GLDG (95). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

MTA's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as GLDG (75). This means that MTA’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.

GLDG's P/E Growth Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MTA (100). This means that GLDG’s stock grew similarly to MTA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDGMTA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLDG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASLGX128.471.50
+1.18%
American Century Select R5
FIVOX10.390.06
+0.58%
Fidelity Advisor International Value C
GSVPX17.220.08
+0.47%
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value P
MXTFX6.980.03
+0.43%
Empower Small Cap Value Instl
PAINX8.21-0.01
-0.12%
PGIM Jennison Intl Sm-Md Cap Opps Z

GLDG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDG
1D Price
Change %
GLDG100%
+1.00%
PAAS - GLDG
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
HL - GLDG
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
SILV - GLDG
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.20%
MTA - GLDG
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
AG - GLDG
42%
Loosely correlated
+5.04%
More

MTA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTA has been closely correlated with SVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTA jumps, then SVM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTA
1D Price
Change %
MTA100%
-1.45%
SVM - MTA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
HL - MTA
73%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
PAAS - MTA
73%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
AEM - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
+1.01%
KGC - MTA
70%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More