Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLFOX vs NMFIX
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts GLFOX vs NMFIX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$17.73
Change-$0.63 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.59B
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
Price$13.82
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets926.75M
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLFOX vs. NMFIX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLFOX is a StrongBuy and NMFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. NMFIX (927M). NMFIX (2.55) and GLFOX (2.48) have matching dividends . GLFOX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: GLFOX (16 years) vs NMFIX (13 years). GLFOX (1.22) is less costly to investors than NMFIX (1.04). NMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.72 vs. GLFOX (36.00). GLFOX (2500) and NMFIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.73 vs. NMFIX (13.53). GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 49.62 vs. NMFIX (29.49).
| GLFOX | NMFIX | GLFOX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.99 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.04 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.258 | 19.154 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.6B | 927M | 1,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 2.55 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.73 | 13.53 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.91 | 17.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.62 | 29.49 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.16 | 47.56 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers