Ad is loading...
GLFOX vs NMFIX
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts GLFOX vs NMFIX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Open
Price$16.87
Change+$0.17 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.24B
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
Price$12.73
Change+$0.13 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.33M
GLFOX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLFOX vs. NMFIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLFOX is a Buy and NMFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLFOX has more cash in the bank: 9.24B vs. NMFIX (844M). NMFIX pays higher dividends than GLFOX: NMFIX (2.56) vs GLFOX (2.33). GLFOX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: GLFOX (15 years) vs NMFIX (13 years). GLFOX (1.23) is less costly to investors than NMFIX (1.04). NMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.35 vs. GLFOX (25.00). GLFOX (2500) and NMFIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GLFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.71 vs. NMFIX (14.63). GLFOX return over 5 years is better than : 44.49 vs. NMFIX (28.01).
| GLFOX | NMFIX | GLFOX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.99 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.04 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.073 | 7.590 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.24B | 844M | 1,094% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.33 | 2.56 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.71 | 14.63 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.91 | 5.39 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.49 | 28.01 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.69 | 27.41 | 163% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers