GLGDF
Price
$1.55
Change
-$0.02 (-1.27%)
Updated
Jul 29 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
8 days until earnings call
GMDMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
32.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLGDF vs GMDMF

Header iconGLGDF vs GMDMF Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs GMDMFBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$1.55
Change-$0.02 (-1.27%)
Volume$71.87K
Capitalization298.17M
Gem Diamonds
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization32.79M
GLGDF vs GMDMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. GMDMF commentary
Jul 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Hold and GMDMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $1.56 vs. GMDMF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF and GMDMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 55% vs. GMDMF: 114%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. GMDMF: $32.79M
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. GMDMF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $32.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGMDMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GMDMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the long-term than GMDMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMDMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GMDMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than GMDMF.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.81% price change this week, while GMDMF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Dec 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than GMDMF($32.8M). GLGDF has higher P/E ratio than GMDMF: GLGDF (769.23) vs GMDMF (3.33). GLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 103.660 vs. GMDMF (-55.300). GMDMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 79.6M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. GMDMF (8.72M). GLGDF has less debt than GMDMF: GLGDF (778K) vs GMDMF (13.8M). GMDMF has higher revenues than GLGDF: GMDMF (189M) vs GLGDF (28.6M).
GLGDFGMDMFGLGDF / GMDMF
Capitalization298M32.8M909%
EBITDA-3.76M79.6M-5%
Gain YTD103.660-55.300-187%
P/E Ratio769.233.3323,085%
Revenue28.6M189M15%
Total Cash88.8M8.72M1,018%
Total Debt778K13.8M6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs GMDMF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
GMDMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6583
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71100
SMR RATING
1..100
8890
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3998
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMDMF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLGDF (89). This means that GMDMF’s stock grew significantly faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as GMDMF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to GMDMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as GMDMF (90). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to GMDMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMDMF (98). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMDMF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMDMF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMDMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDFGMDMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRRTF10.540.09
+0.88%
SLATE GROCERY REIT
FSNUF46.21N/A
N/A
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
NXPRF138.95N/A
N/A
Nexans Paris ACT
EMUSF0.10N/A
N/A
ELECTRIC METALS USA LTD.
WPFH2.32-0.28
-10.77%
WPF Holdings, Inc.

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-0.76%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.56%
EXK - GLGDF
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
More

GMDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMDMF has been loosely correlated with GSMGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMDMF jumps, then GSMGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMDMF
1D Price
Change %
GMDMF100%
N/A
GSMGF - GMDMF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GMDMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USHAF - GMDMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-46.80%
GLGDF - GMDMF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
GNYPF - GMDMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More