Ad is loading...
GLGDF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.03 (-3.37%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
31 days until earnings call
GNYPF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

GLGDF vs GNYPF

Header iconGLGDF vs GNYPF Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs GNYPFBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$0.86
Change-$0.03 (-3.37%)
Volume$245.27K
CapitalizationN/A
MASIVO SILVER
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4K
CapitalizationN/A
GLGDF vs GNYPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. GNYPF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Sell and GNYPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $0.86 vs. GNYPF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF and GNYPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 149% vs. GNYPF: 14%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. GNYPF: $5.83M
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. GNYPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNYPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNYPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNYPF is a better buy in the long-term than GLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.08% price change this week, while GNYPF (@Precious Metals) price change was -16.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than GNYPF($5.83M). GLGDF YTD gains are higher at: -15.686 vs. GNYPF (-32.400).
GLGDFGNYPFGLGDF / GNYPF
Capitalization298M5.83M5,110%
EBITDA-3.76MN/A-
Gain YTD-15.686-32.40048%
P/E Ratio769.23N/A-
Revenue28.6MN/A-
Total Cash88.8MN/A-
Total Debt778KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs GNYPF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
GNYPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNYPF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGDF (98). This means that GNYPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as GNYPF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to GNYPF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GNYPF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to GNYPF’s over the last 12 months.

GNYPF's Price Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (81). This means that GNYPF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNYPF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than GNYPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA320.729.54
+3.07%
Tesla
LEE16.30-0.11
-0.67%
Lee Enterprises
EPAC47.56-0.55
-1.14%
Enerpac Tool Group Corp
LDI2.42-0.13
-5.10%
loanDepot
MMYT97.53-5.50
-5.34%
MakeMyTrip Limited

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-3.65%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.79%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
+9.45%
SILV - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
More

GNYPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNYPF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNYPF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNYPF
1D Price
Change %
GNYPF100%
N/A
MNSAF - GNYPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RJKAF - GNYPF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSXGF - GNYPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.07%
GLGDF - GNYPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.65%
GOTRF - GNYPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
More