GLGDF
Price
$1.26
Change
+$0.05 (+4.13%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
13 days until earnings call
IEGCF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 23 closing price
Capitalization
29.37M
Ad is loading...

GLGDF vs IEGCF

Header iconGLGDF vs IEGCF Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs IEGCFBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$1.26
Change+$0.05 (+4.13%)
Volume$150.31K
Capitalization298.17M
Independence Gold
Price$0.11
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$528.48K
Capitalization29.37M
GLGDF vs IEGCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. IEGCF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Hold and IEGCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $1.26 vs. IEGCF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF and IEGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 66% vs. IEGCF: 210%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. IEGCF: $29.37M
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. IEGCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $29.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIEGCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IEGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the long-term than IEGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IEGCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IEGCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than IEGCF.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.83% price change this week, while IEGCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.30% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLGDF($298M) has a higher market cap than IEGCF($29.4M). GLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 65.020 vs. IEGCF (-19.259). IEGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.36M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. IEGCF (462K). IEGCF has less debt than GLGDF: IEGCF (473K) vs GLGDF (778K). GLGDF has higher revenues than IEGCF: GLGDF (28.6M) vs IEGCF (0).
GLGDFIEGCFGLGDF / IEGCF
Capitalization298M29.4M1,014%
EBITDA-3.76M-2.36M159%
Gain YTD65.020-19.259-338%
P/E Ratio769.23N/A-
Revenue28.6M0-
Total Cash88.8M462K19,221%
Total Debt778K473K164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs IEGCF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
IEGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6413
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6548
SMR RATING
1..100
9095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4488
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IEGCF's Valuation (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGDF (93). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

IEGCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (65). This means that IEGCF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as IEGCF (95). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IEGCF (88). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IEGCF (100). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than IEGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDFIEGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IEGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNET5.290.42
+8.62%
VNET Group
ARCT12.630.46
+3.78%
Arcturus Therapeutics Holdings
FCX35.191.13
+3.32%
Freeport-McMoran
EUDA3.900.04
+1.04%
EUDA Health Holdings Limited
FCFS120.56-1.05
-0.86%
FirstCash Holdings

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
+4.33%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
SILV - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

IEGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEGCF has been loosely correlated with HL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEGCF jumps, then HL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEGCF
1D Price
Change %
IEGCF100%
+0.09%
HL - IEGCF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.83%
ASM - IEGCF
38%
Loosely correlated
+7.25%
OCGSF - IEGCF
37%
Loosely correlated
+13.68%
AG - IEGCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
GLGDF - IEGCF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.33%
More