GLGDF
Price
$1.52
Change
+$0.04 (+2.70%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
41 days until earnings call
ORZCF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.01 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
323.07M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLGDF vs ORZCF

Header iconGLGDF vs ORZCF Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs ORZCFBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$1.52
Change+$0.04 (+2.70%)
Volume$235.53K
Capitalization298.17M
Orezone Gold
Price$0.86
Change+$0.01 (+1.18%)
Volume$65.51K
Capitalization323.07M
GLGDF vs ORZCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. ORZCF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Hold and ORZCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $1.52 vs. ORZCF: $0.86)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF and ORZCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 62% vs. ORZCF: 8%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. ORZCF: $323.07M
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. ORZCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $323.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileORZCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ORZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORZCF is a better buy in the long-term than GLGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORZCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ORZCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than ORZCF.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.74% price change this week, while ORZCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

ORZCF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ORZCF($323M) has a higher market cap than GLGDF($298M). GLGDF has higher P/E ratio than ORZCF: GLGDF (769.23) vs ORZCF (9.67). GLGDF (98.693) and ORZCF (95.011) have similar YTD gains . ORZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.9M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). GLGDF has more cash in the bank: 88.8M vs. ORZCF (45.2M). GLGDF has less debt than ORZCF: GLGDF (778K) vs ORZCF (115M). ORZCF has higher revenues than GLGDF: ORZCF (125M) vs GLGDF (28.6M).
GLGDFORZCFGLGDF / ORZCF
Capitalization298M323M92%
EBITDA-3.76M51.9M-7%
Gain YTD98.69395.011104%
P/E Ratio769.239.677,954%
Revenue28.6M125M23%
Total Cash88.8M45.2M196%
Total Debt778K115M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs ORZCF: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
ORZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6874
SMR RATING
1..100
8838
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORZCF's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGDF (89). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as ORZCF (74). This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to ORZCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLGDF (88). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (38). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as GLGDF (62). This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to GLGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDFORZCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGCCX95.05N/A
N/A
Gabelli Growth C
PCSVX16.26N/A
N/A
PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity P
ESPIX36.98N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Small Cap Value Adm
GCSUX27.00N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts R6
WBCRX16.10N/A
N/A
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core R6

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-0.07%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.80%
EXK - GLGDF
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
More

ORZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORZCF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ORZCF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORZCF
1D Price
Change %
ORZCF100%
-0.09%
AEM - ORZCF
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
NFGC - ORZCF
41%
Loosely correlated
+3.45%
ISVLF - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.49%
ARMN - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
GLGDF - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More