GLGDF
Price
$1.48
Change
-$0.11 (-6.92%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
298.17M
43 days until earnings call
PAAS
Price
$28.69
Change
+$0.30 (+1.06%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.59B
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLGDF vs PAAS

Header iconGLGDF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts GLGDF vs PAASBanner chart's image
GoGold Resources
Price$1.48
Change-$0.11 (-6.92%)
Volume$439.68K
Capitalization298.17M
Pan American Silver
Price$28.69
Change+$0.30 (+1.06%)
Volume$50.73K
Capitalization5.59B
GLGDF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLGDF vs. PAAS commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLGDF is a Hold and PAAS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GLGDF: $1.48 vs. PAAS: $28.39)
Brand notoriety: GLGDF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLGDF: 259% vs. PAAS: 83%
Market capitalization -- GLGDF: $298.17M vs. PAAS: $5.59B
GLGDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $298.17M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLGDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLGDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the long-term than PAAS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLGDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLGDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLGDF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

GLGDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.45% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.45% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($5.59B) has a higher market cap than GLGDF($298M). GLGDF YTD gains are higher at: 93.464 vs. PAAS (41.608). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 296M vs. GLGDF (-3.76M). PAAS has higher revenues than GLGDF: PAAS (2.02B) vs GLGDF (28.6M).
GLGDFPAASGLGDF / PAAS
Capitalization298M5.59B5%
EBITDA-3.76M296M-1%
Gain YTD93.46441.608225%
P/E Ratio769.23N/A-
Revenue28.6M2.02B1%
Total Cash88.8MN/A-
Total Debt778KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLGDF vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
GLGDF
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7622
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6783
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6597
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLGDF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (50) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (83) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

GLGDF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (97) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that GLGDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLGDFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESGV107.511.42
+1.34%
Vanguard ESG US Stock ETF
RWO44.670.13
+0.29%
SPDR® Dow Jones® Global Real Estate ETF
IBTL20.400.06
+0.27%
iShares iBonds Dec 2031 Term Tr ETF
MPA10.71-0.03
-0.28%
Blackrock Muniyield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
EUO28.24-0.13
-0.46%
ProShares UltraShort Euro

GLGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLGDF has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLGDF jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLGDF
1D Price
Change %
GLGDF100%
-6.62%
PAAS - GLGDF
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
MAG - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
HL - GLGDF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
AYASF - GLGDF
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
EXK - GLGDF
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
More