Ad is loading...
GLIFX vs NMFIX
GLIFX vs NMFIX Comparison
Open Charts GLIFX vs NMFIX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Inst
Price$17.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.66B
Northern Multi-Mgr Glbl Listed Infra
Price$13.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets854.58M
GLIFX vs NMFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLIFX vs. NMFIX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLIFX is a Buy and NMFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLIFX has more cash in the bank: 9.66B vs. NMFIX (855M). NMFIX (2.47) and GLIFX (2.47) have matching dividends . GLIFX was incepted earlier than NMFIX: GLIFX (15 years) vs NMFIX (13 years). NMFIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than GLIFX (0.97). NMFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.35 vs. GLIFX (36.00). NMFIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLIFX: NMFIX (2500) vs GLIFX (10000). GLIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. NMFIX (9.80). GLIFX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. NMFIX (32.17).
| GLIFX | NMFIX | GLIFX / NMFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.04 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.674 | 11.091 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 2500 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.66B | 855M | 1,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 2.47 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.14 | 9.80 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 16.53 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 32.17 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.52 | 31.34 | 177% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...