Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SFCWX
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$23.82
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$71.56
Change+$0.48 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GLNAX (74.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SFCWX (0.96) vs GLNAX (0.32). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNAX (13 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNAX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. SFCWX (5.16). GLNAX (20.17) and SFCWX (19.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNAX | SFCWX | GLNAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.172 | 3.906 | 184% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.96 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 5.16 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.03 | 17.81 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.17 | 19.96 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement