Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SFCWX
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery A
Price$24.14
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.07M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.00
Change+$0.43 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.69B
GLNAX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 77.7B vs. GLNAX (75.1M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNAX (0.31). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNAX (14 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNAX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNAX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.06 vs. SFCWX (3.64). GLNAX (19.87) and SFCWX (19.59) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNAX | SFCWX | GLNAX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.65 | 278% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.841 | 7.483 | 118% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.1M | 77.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.31 | 0.94 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.06 | 3.64 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.59 | 34.72 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.87 | 19.59 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement