Ad is loading...
GLNBX vs SCWFX
GLNBX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$19.99
Change-$0.33 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.96M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$66.37
Change-$1.50 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.42B
GLNBX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SCWFX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 74.4B vs. GLNBX (71M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SCWFX (0.58) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNBX (13 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). GLNBX (29.00) and SCWFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNBX: SCWFX (250) vs GLNBX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.48 vs. GLNBX (0.86). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.60 vs. GLNBX (4.28).
| GLNBX | SCWFX | GLNBX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.756 | 0.121 | 626% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71M | 74.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 1.48 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.91 | 1.05 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.28 | 12.60 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.59 | 43.60 | 91% |