Ad is loading...
GLNBX vs SFCWX
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$19.12
Change-$0.59 (-2.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.91M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$62.46
Change-$2.98 (-4.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.74B
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 69.7B vs. GLNBX (69.9M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SFCWX (1.04) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNBX (13 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNBX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.65 vs. SFCWX (-4.72). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 53.43 vs. GLNBX (42.93).
| GLNBX | SFCWX | GLNBX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.655 | -4.980 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.9M | 69.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.65 | -4.72 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.00 | -5.29 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.93 | 53.43 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers