Ad is loading...
GLNBX vs SFCWX
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$19.81
Change+$0.38 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.28M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$63.93
Change+$0.73 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets67.16B
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SFCWX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 67.2B vs. GLNBX (68.3M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SFCWX (1.04) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNBX (13 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNBX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.31 vs. SFCWX (-4.44). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 26.81 vs. GLNBX (22.74).
| GLNBX | SFCWX | GLNBX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.873 | -8.233 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.3M | 67.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | -4.44 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.26 | -0.10 | -1,288% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.74 | 26.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...