Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNBX vs SFCWX
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNBX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery B
Price$21.77
Change+$0.07 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.82M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$74.37
Change+$0.31 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.22B
GLNBX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNBX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNBX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 78.2B vs. GLNBX (75.8M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNBX: SFCWX (0.94) vs GLNBX (0.00). GLNBX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNBX (14 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNBX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNBX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. SFCWX (9.37). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 20.95 vs. GLNBX (19.03).
| GLNBX | SFCWX | GLNBX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.728 | 8.021 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 75.8M | 78.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.94 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 9.37 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.20 | 32.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.03 | 20.95 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement