Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSEBX
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.93
Change-$0.18 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.85M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$71.78
Change-$0.51 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.34B
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 81.3B vs. GLNCX (72.9M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). RSEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. GLNCX (5.94). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 11.05 vs. GLNCX (9.89).
| GLNCX | RSEBX | GLNCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.442 | 10.419 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.9M | 81.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 7.24 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.45 | 28.52 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.89 | 11.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.90 | 51.90 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement