Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSEBX
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.51
Change+$0.24 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.68M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$69.26
Change+$0.88 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. GLNCX (74.7M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSEBX (0.21) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). GLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.36 vs. RSEBX (8.83). RSEBX (20.29) and GLNCX (19.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNCX | RSEBX | GLNCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.208 | 6.543 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.7M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.36 | 8.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.38 | 27.84 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.83 | 20.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.85 | 38.91 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers