Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs RSEBX
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.65M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$68.93
Change-$0.57 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets78.39B
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 78.4B vs. GLNCX (74.6M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNCX (14 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). GLNCX (6.73) and RSEBX (6.65) have marching annual gain over last year. RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 11.67 vs. GLNCX (10.65).
| GLNCX | RSEBX | GLNCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.863 | 6.035 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.6M | 78.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 6.65 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 22.18 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.65 | 11.67 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.53 | 38.39 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement