Ad is loading...
GLNCX vs RSEBX
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs RSEBX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$19.71
Change+$0.15 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.33M
American Funds SMALLCAP World R2E
Price$61.67
Change+$0.79 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.86B
GLNCX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. RSEBX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Buy and RSEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 68.9B vs. GLNCX (69.3M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: RSEBX (0.23) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: GLNCX (13 years) vs RSEBX (11 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than RSEBX (1.45). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. RSEBX (32.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNCX: RSEBX (250) vs GLNCX (1000). GLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.35 vs. RSEBX (-4.98). RSEBX return over 5 years is better than : 47.10 vs. GLNCX (43.03).
| GLNCX | RSEBX | GLNCX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 1.45 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 1.45 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.655 | -5.167 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.3M | 68.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.35 | -4.98 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.33 | -6.23 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.03 | 47.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.59 | 28.92 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers