Ad is loading...
GLNLX vs SCWFX
GLNLX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$22.46
Change+$0.10 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.74M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$67.13
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.12B
GLNLX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 75.1B vs. GLNLX (73.7M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SCWFX (0.58) vs GLNLX (0.00). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNLX (13 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). GLNLX (29.00) and SCWFX (29.00) have comparable annual turnover. GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNLX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.76 vs. GLNLX (6.96). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.68 vs. GLNLX (9.40).
| GLNLX | SCWFX | GLNLX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.400 | 1.267 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.7M | 75.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 7.76 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.69 | -4.74 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.40 | 13.68 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.94 | 53.34 | 120% |