Ad is loading...
GLNLX vs SCWFX
GLNLX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNLX vs SCWFX
MFS Global New Discovery R3
Price$23.10
Change+$0.04 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.22M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F1
Price$65.10
Change+$0.21 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.85B
GLNLX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNLX vs. SCWFX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNLX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. GLNLX (72.2M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNLX: SCWFX (0.58) vs GLNLX (0.38). GLNLX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNLX (13 years) vs SCWFX (24 years). GLNLX (1.81) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.08). GLNLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SCWFX (32.00). GLNLX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNLX (0) vs SCWFX (250). GLNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.69 vs. SCWFX (-0.44). GLNLX return over 5 years is better than : 29.19 vs. SCWFX (23.80).
| GLNLX | SCWFX | GLNLX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.08 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.08 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.289 | -1.795 | -239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 0.58 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.69 | -0.44 | -1,057% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.27 | 18.37 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.19 | 23.80 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.39 | 33.98 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers