Advertisement
GM vs STLA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? General Motors (GM) vs. Stellantis (STLA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Profitability gap: GM is generating healthy adjusted margins near 10%, while STLA is operating at razor-thin margins of roughly 1%–2% amid an ongoing turnaround.
- Valuation contrast: GM trades at roughly 6–7 times earnings with a market cap near $68 billion; STLA trades at only about 0.2 times book value with a market cap near $12.7 billion.
- Momentum divergence: GM has held up on strong truck demand and cost discipline, while STLA shares have fallen sharply over the past year, down roughly 59% year to date.
- Cash flow profile: GM is returning capital through buybacks and a quarterly dividend, whereas STLA has suspended its dividend and is working to stabilize industrial cash flow.
- Regional exposure: GM is heavily weighted to profitable North American truck sales, while STLA's recovery hinges on both North America and a lower-margin European market.
Introduction
General Motors and Stellantis are two of the world's largest automakers, yet they currently sit at opposite ends of the investor sentiment spectrum. GM has been a relative outperformer, supported by disciplined cost management, leading U.S. pickup share, and consistent capital returns. Stellantis, by contrast, is in the middle of a difficult reset after steep losses and a strategic retreat from its electric-vehicle ambitions. This stock comparison is relevant for investors weighing a more established profitability story against a deeply discounted turnaround opportunity, and for traders tracking relative performance and market positioning within the global automotive sector.
GM Overview and Recent Performance
General Motors designs, builds, and sells trucks, crossovers, cars, and parts worldwide, with a portfolio spanning Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac, and Buick. In its most recent quarter, GM reported revenue of about $43.6 billion, slightly lower year over year, while adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of $3.70 exceeded analyst expectations. Adjusted earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) rose roughly 22% to about $4.3 billion, and the adjusted EBIT margin expanded to 9.7% from 7.9% a year earlier.
Recent weeks have been defined by a mix of headwinds and tailwinds. A favorable U.S. Supreme Court ruling on certain tariffs provided an unexpected benefit, prompting GM to raise its full-year adjusted EBIT and adjusted EPS guidance. At the same time, management has cited tariff costs, EV-related restructuring charges, and elevated raw-material costs tied to Middle East tensions as ongoing pressures. GM has also continued to lean on its strong North American truck franchise, holding about 42% of the U.S. full-size pickup market, while scaling back EV production to match softer demand and repurchasing shares to support EPS.
STLA Overview and Recent Performance
Stellantis was formed from the merger of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles and PSA Group and operates a broad portfolio of brands including Jeep, Ram, Peugeot, Citroën, Opel, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, and Maserati. The company is navigating a multi-year turnaround after shipments and profitability deteriorated sharply in 2024 and 2025. More recently, Stellantis returned to modest profitability, posting a first-quarter net profit after a loss a year earlier and a second-quarter net profit on revenue of roughly €43.5 billion.
However, the recovery remains fragile. Third-quarter shipments declined about 1% year over year, masking a 12% drop in North America—largely tied to planned summer production shutdowns of certain Jeep models—offset by a roughly 10% increase in Europe. Industrial free cash flow has been volatile, and adjusted operating margins remain thin at around 1%–2%. Management has suspended the dividend, issued hybrid bonds to shore up the balance sheet, and launched the "FaSTLAne 2030" plan to cut development times and refocus the brand portfolio, while the CEO has publicly cautioned that U.S. EV adoption remains stalled.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed to navigate changing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that collectively monitor and trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest and most suitable performers earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance statistics, and sets of tickers, allowing users to explore approaches aligned with their own goals and risk tolerance. If you're interested in seeing which strategies are currently leading the pack, visit the Trending AI Robots page to review the latest top-performing bots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast between these two names is profitability. GM's North America-focused model is generating double-digit segment margins and strong cash generation, while Stellantis is still stabilizing its operations and rebuilding industrial free cash flow. In terms of growth drivers, GM benefits from high-margin truck and SUV demand, a growing software and services revenue stream, and share repurchases, whereas Stellantis is banking on refreshed product launches and cost-cutting to restore earnings power.
Risk profiles also differ. GM faces tariff exposure, EV restructuring costs, and reliance on a truck-heavy mix. Stellantis carries higher execution risk, with a suspended dividend, elevated net debt, thin margins, and a European market under pressure from Chinese competitors. From a valuation standpoint, GM trades at a premium multiple to its cyclical earnings, while Stellantis trades at a deep discount to book value, reflecting skepticism about the turnaround. Sentiment is materially more constructive on GM, which has drawn price-target increases, than on STLA, where consensus ratings remain cautious.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor GM over STLA in the current environment. GM demonstrates more consistent earnings momentum, stronger margins, a steadier capital-return program, and more constructive analyst sentiment, all of which tend to support trend stability. Stellantis offers a potentially larger re-rating opportunity given its depressed valuation, but its thinner margins, negative momentum, and ongoing turnaround execution risk make its trend less reliable at present. This assessment reflects relative positioning rather than a prediction of future returns.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GM is a Hold and STLA is a Hold.
GM in downward trend: 10-day moving average crossed below 50-day moving average on September 22, 2026
The 10-day moving average for GM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GM as a result. In 61 of 95 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GM turned negative on October 20, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.
GM moved below its 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Aroon Indicator for GM entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +1.10% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GM advanced for three days, in 240 of 346 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
GM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 57 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 58 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. GM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 61 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.093) is normal, around the industry mean (1.879). P/E Ratio (33.570) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.642). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.283) is also within normal values, averaging (2.450). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.154) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.426) is also within normal values, averaging (2.648).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 88 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
STLA in upward trend: price may jump up because it broke its lower Bollinger Band on September 18, 2026
STLA may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 32 of 41 cases where STLA's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where STLA's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 25 of 40 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for STLA just turned positive on October 07, 2026. Looking at past instances where STLA's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
Following a +2.34% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where STLA advanced for three days, in 199 of 294 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on STLA as a result. In 55 of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STLA declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for STLA entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 48 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.202) is normal, around the industry mean (1.879). P/E Ratio (-0.631) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.642). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.817) is also within normal values, averaging (2.450). STLA's Dividend Yield (2.097) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.154). P/S Ratio (0.077) is also within normal values, averaging (2.648).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. STLA’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 95 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. STLA’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
GM | STLA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 48 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
STLA's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as GM (61) in the Motor Vehicles industry. This means that STLA’s stock grew similarly to GM’s over the last 12 months.
GM's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Motor Vehicles industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STLA (100) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew somewhat faster than STLA’s over the last 12 months.
GM's SMR Rating (88) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as STLA (97) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to STLA’s over the last 12 months.
GM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as STLA (84) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to STLA’s over the last 12 months.
GM's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Motor Vehicles industry is in the same range as STLA (17) in the null industry. This means that GM’s stock grew similarly to STLA’s over the last 12 months.
| GM | STLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 12 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 65% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while STLA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STLA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STLA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- STLA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GM (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а -7.71% price change this week, while STLA (@Motor Vehicles) price change was -1.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was -6.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -18.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -34.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
GM is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2027.
STLA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (-6.23% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
Advertisement