It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMBXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHBM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMBXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HBM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GMBXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -7.27% price change this week, while HBM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -18.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.33%.
GMBXF is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
HBM is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
GMBXF | HBM | GMBXF / HBM | |
Capitalization | 40.6B | 2.45B | 1,659% |
EBITDA | 7.1B | 621M | 1,144% |
Gain YTD | -11.813 | 42.029 | -28% |
P/E Ratio | 12.74 | 31.73 | 40% |
Revenue | 14B | 1.69B | 828% |
Total Cash | 6.63B | 251M | 2,643% |
Total Debt | 8.82B | 1.38B | 640% |
GMBXF | HBM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 6 Undervalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GMBXF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HBM (75) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMBXF’s stock grew significantly faster than HBM’s over the last 12 months.
GMBXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as HBM (42) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
GMBXF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HBM (84) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMBXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HBM’s over the last 12 months.
HBM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as GMBXF (72) in the null industry. This means that HBM’s stock grew similarly to GMBXF’s over the last 12 months.
GMBXF's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as HBM (98) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that GMBXF’s stock grew similarly to HBM’s over the last 12 months.
GMBXF | HBM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago77% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago74% | 9 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMBXF has been closely correlated with SCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMBXF jumps, then SCCO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMBXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GMBXF | 100% | -3.22% | ||
SCCO - GMBXF | 66% Closely correlated | -3.91% | ||
FCX - GMBXF | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.70% | ||
HBM - GMBXF | 55% Loosely correlated | -6.22% | ||
TECK - GMBXF | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.68% | ||
IVPAF - GMBXF | 53% Loosely correlated | -5.19% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBM has been closely correlated with LUNMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBM jumps, then LUNMF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HBM | 100% | -6.22% | ||
LUNMF - HBM | 81% Closely correlated | -4.03% | ||
SCCO - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | -3.91% | ||
FCX - HBM | 80% Closely correlated | -4.70% | ||
TECK - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | -4.68% | ||
TGB - HBM | 77% Closely correlated | -4.95% | ||
More |