GMDMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jul 22 closing price
Capitalization
32.79M
GNYPF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
5.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMDMF vs GNYPF

Header iconGMDMF vs GNYPF Comparison
Open Charts GMDMF vs GNYPFBanner chart's image
Gem Diamonds
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization32.79M
MASIVO SILVER
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$47K
Capitalization5.83M
GMDMF vs GNYPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNYPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMDMF vs. GNYPF commentary
Jul 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMDMF is a Hold and GNYPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 30, 2025
Stock price -- (GMDMF: $0.04 vs. GNYPF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: GMDMF and GNYPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMDMF: 114% vs. GNYPF: 104%
Market capitalization -- GMDMF: $32.79M vs. GNYPF: $5.83M
GMDMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $32.79M. GNYPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMDMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNYPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GMDMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNYPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNYPF is a better buy in the long-term than GMDMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMDMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNYPF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMDMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GNYPF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNYPF is a better buy in the short-term than GMDMF.

Price Growth

GMDMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GNYPF (@Precious Metals) price change was +15.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +50.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.02% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMDMF($32.8M) has a higher market cap than GNYPF($5.83M). GNYPF YTD gains are higher at: 229.621 vs. GMDMF (-55.300).
GMDMFGNYPFGMDMF / GNYPF
Capitalization32.8M5.83M562%
EBITDA79.6MN/A-
Gain YTD-55.300229.621-24%
P/E Ratio3.33N/A-
Revenue189MN/A-
Total Cash8.72MN/A-
Total Debt13.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMDMF vs GNYPF: Fundamental Ratings
GMDMF
GNYPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8330
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMDMF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNYPF (55). This means that GMDMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNYPF’s over the last 12 months.

GMDMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GNYPF (100). This means that GMDMF’s stock grew similarly to GNYPF’s over the last 12 months.

GMDMF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as GNYPF (99). This means that GMDMF’s stock grew similarly to GNYPF’s over the last 12 months.

GNYPF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMDMF (98). This means that GNYPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMDMF’s over the last 12 months.

GNYPF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GMDMF (100). This means that GNYPF’s stock grew similarly to GMDMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMDMFGNYPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMDMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNYPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SRRTF10.540.09
+0.88%
SLATE GROCERY REIT
FSNUF46.21N/A
N/A
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
NXPRF138.95N/A
N/A
Nexans Paris ACT
EMUSF0.10N/A
N/A
ELECTRIC METALS USA LTD.
WPFH2.32-0.28
-10.77%
WPF Holdings, Inc.

GMDMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMDMF has been loosely correlated with GSMGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMDMF jumps, then GSMGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMDMF
1D Price
Change %
GMDMF100%
N/A
GSMGF - GMDMF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SRBIF - GMDMF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USHAF - GMDMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-46.80%
GLGDF - GMDMF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
GNYPF - GMDMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GNYPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNYPF and MNSAF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNYPF and MNSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNYPF
1D Price
Change %
GNYPF100%
N/A
MNSAF - GNYPF
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
BSXGF - GNYPF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.91%
GLGDF - GNYPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
GOTRF - GNYPF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
GMDMF - GNYPF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More