18 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
GMF vs YUMC
GMF vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts GMF vs YUMC
SPDR® S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF
Price$109.65
Change+$0.61 (+0.56%)
Volume$27.59K
Net Assets334.74M
Yum China Holdings
Price$41.36
Change-$2.58 (-5.87%)
Volume$67.52K
Capitalization15.47B
GMF vs YUMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMF vs. YUMC commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMF is a Hold and YUMC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
YUMC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GMF | YUMC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 16 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with WB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then WB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| WB - GMF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| BZ - GMF | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| BEKE - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.70% | ||
More | ||||
YUMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUMC has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUMC jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YUMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YUMC | 100% | -1.39% | ||
| YUM - YUMC | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
| ARCO - YUMC | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.82% | ||
| QSR - YUMC | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| FRSH - YUMC | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
| CNNE - YUMC | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
More | ||||