GMGSF
Price
$20.50
Change
-$1.00 (-4.65%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
25.93B
RBLAY
Price
$5.55
Change
-$0.09 (-1.60%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMGSF vs RBLAY

Header iconGMGSF vs RBLAY Comparison
Open Charts GMGSF vs RBLAYBanner chart's image
Goodman Group Sydney NSW
Price$20.50
Change-$1.00 (-4.65%)
Volume$455
Capitalization25.93B
Robinsons Land
Price$5.55
Change-$0.09 (-1.60%)
Volume$9.98K
Capitalization1.34B
GMGSF vs RBLAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMGSF vs. RBLAY commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMGSF is a Hold and RBLAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (RBLAY: $5.55)
Brand notoriety:
Market capitalization --

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBLAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.

  • RBLAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMGSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBLAY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMGSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RBLAY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBLAY is a better buy in the short-term than GMGSF.

Price Growth

RBLAY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.42% price change this weekfor the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-0.03% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMGSF($25.9B) has a higher market cap than RBLAY($1.34B). GMGSF has higher P/E ratio than RBLAY: GMGSF (15.13) vs RBLAY (13.51). RBLAY YTD gains are higher at: -2.340 vs. GMGSF (-9.492). RBLAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. GMGSF (2.97B). RBLAY has more cash in the bank: 6.48B vs. GMGSF (1.78B). GMGSF has less debt than RBLAY: GMGSF (2.99B) vs RBLAY (53.5B). RBLAY has higher revenues than GMGSF: RBLAY (48.1B) vs GMGSF (2.05B).
GMGSFRBLAYGMGSF / RBLAY
Capitalization25.9B1.34B1,931%
EBITDA2.97B20.7B14%
Gain YTD-9.492-2.340406%
P/E Ratio15.1313.51112%
Revenue2.05B48.1B4%
Total Cash1.78B6.48B27%
Total Debt2.99B53.5B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMGSF vs RBLAY: Fundamental Ratings
GMGSF
RBLAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9094
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
9275
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9961
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBLAY's Valuation (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMGSF (99). This means that RBLAY’s stock grew significantly faster than GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

GMGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBLAY (100). This means that GMGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBLAY’s over the last 12 months.

RBLAY's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as GMGSF (92). This means that RBLAY’s stock grew similarly to GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

RBLAY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as GMGSF (61). This means that RBLAY’s stock grew similarly to GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

RBLAY's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMGSF (99). This means that RBLAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMGSFRBLAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCBX46.860.76
+1.65%
MFS Technology B
KNGAX11.590.03
+0.26%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt Inc A
HGIRX57.08N/A
N/A
Hartford Core Equity R3
LGCRX18.87N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Global Equity R3
IOVVX32.42N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock Select R5

GMGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMGSF and VGPBF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMGSF and VGPBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMGSF
1D Price
Change %
GMGSF100%
N/A
VGPBF - GMGSF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KRYPY - GMGSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBLAY - GMGSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
GEAHF - GMGSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRNNF - GMGSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RBLAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBLAY has been loosely correlated with AYAAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBLAY jumps, then AYAAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBLAY
1D Price
Change %
RBLAY100%
-1.51%
AYAAY - RBLAY
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GMGSF - RBLAY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNLAY - RBLAY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPHXF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIUDF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More