Ad is loading...
GMINF
Price
$7.46
Change
+$0.10 (+1.36%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
JUPGF
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

GMINF vs JUPGF

Header iconGMINF vs JUPGF Comparison
Open Charts GMINF vs JUPGFBanner chart's image
G Mining Ventures
Price$7.46
Change+$0.10 (+1.36%)
Volume$44.85K
CapitalizationN/A
Jupiter Gold
Price$0.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125
CapitalizationN/A
GMINF vs JUPGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMINF vs. JUPGF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMINF is a Hold and JUPGF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GMINF: $7.47 vs. JUPGF: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: GMINF and JUPGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMINF: 208% vs. JUPGF: 3%
Market capitalization -- GMINF: $422.01M vs. JUPGF: $7.31M
GMINF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $422.01M. JUPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileJUPGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GMINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • JUPGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMINF is a better buy in the long-term than JUPGF.

Price Growth

GMINF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.52% price change this week, while JUPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +24.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMINF($422M) has a higher market cap than JUPGF($7.31M). GMINF YTD gains are higher at: 74.416 vs. JUPGF (-32.009). JUPGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -528.67K vs. GMINF (-6.55M). GMINF (0) and JUPGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GMINFJUPGFGMINF / JUPGF
Capitalization422M7.31M5,775%
EBITDA-6.55M-528.67K1,239%
Gain YTD74.416-32.009-232%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash121MN/A-
Total Debt15.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
JUPGF: Fundamental Ratings
JUPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LTUM0.04N/A
+12.25%
Lithium Corporation.
PNRLF0.360.01
+1.69%
Premium Nickel Resources Ltd.
BAESF16.800.27
+1.63%
BAE Systems PLC
PUTKY33.070.17
+0.52%
PT United Tractors
SGSOY9.64-0.12
-1.23%
SGS SA

GMINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMINF has been loosely correlated with JUPGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMINF jumps, then JUPGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMINF
1D Price
Change %
GMINF100%
+1.29%
JUPGF - GMINF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVMF - GMINF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
GRCAF - GMINF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RGCCF - GMINF
28%
Poorly correlated
+13.92%
ARGTF - GMINF
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
More

JUPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JUPGF has been loosely correlated with GMINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JUPGF jumps, then GMINF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JUPGF
1D Price
Change %
JUPGF100%
N/A
GMINF - JUPGF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
AAUGF - JUPGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-10.00%
HELOF - JUPGF
20%
Poorly correlated
+8.70%
GRCAF - JUPGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JAGGF - JUPGF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
More