GMINF
Price
$7.15
Change
-$0.22 (-2.99%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
RGCCF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

GMINF vs RGCCF

Header iconGMINF vs RGCCF Comparison
Open Charts GMINF vs RGCCFBanner chart's image
G Mining Ventures
Price$7.15
Change-$0.22 (-2.99%)
Volume$47.76K
CapitalizationN/A
RELEVANT GOLD
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$82.19K
CapitalizationN/A
GMINF vs RGCCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GMINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMINF vs. RGCCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMINF is a Hold and RGCCF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (GMINF: $7.15 vs. RGCCF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: GMINF and RGCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMINF: 190% vs. RGCCF: 201%
Market capitalization -- GMINF: $422.01M vs. RGCCF: $7.55M
GMINF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $422.01M. RGCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $7.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGCCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GMINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGCCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMINF is a better buy in the long-term than RGCCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGCCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGCCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMINF is a better buy in the short-term than RGCCF.

Price Growth

GMINF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.96% price change this week, while RGCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMINF($422M) has a higher market cap than RGCCF($7.55M). GMINF YTD gains are higher at: 67.056 vs. RGCCF (20.937). RGCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -5.98M vs. GMINF (-6.55M). GMINF has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. RGCCF (766K). GMINF (0) and RGCCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GMINFRGCCFGMINF / RGCCF
Capitalization422M7.55M5,593%
EBITDA-6.55M-5.98M109%
Gain YTD67.05620.937320%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash121M766K15,796%
Total Debt15.8MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMINFRGCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GMINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PALRX18.75N/A
N/A
PGIM Balanced R
PSCCX29.00N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Small Company C
CNWAX79.53-1.83
-2.25%
American Funds New World 529A
TSTRX19.58-0.59
-2.93%
Transamerica Stock Index R
EGWCX10.50-0.43
-3.93%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr C

GMINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMINF has been loosely correlated with JUPGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMINF jumps, then JUPGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMINF
1D Price
Change %
GMINF100%
-2.99%
JUPGF - GMINF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EDVMF - GMINF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
GRCAF - GMINF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
RGCCF - GMINF
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
ARGTF - GMINF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.67%
More

RGCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGCCF and GMINF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGCCF and GMINF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGCCF
1D Price
Change %
RGCCF100%
-7.08%
GMINF - RGCCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.99%
ASM - RGCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.63%
DCHRF - RGCCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDEJF - RGCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMMSF - RGCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More