GMS vs PPIH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Buy and PPIH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePPIH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- GMS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PPIH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPIH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PPIH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while PPIH (@Building Products) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -4.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMS is expected to report earnings on Jun 19, 2025.
PPIH is expected to report earnings on Dec 05, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-4.22% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| GMS | PPIH | GMS / PPIH | |
| Capitalization | 3.88B | 62.8M | 6,174% |
| EBITDA | 593M | 14.8M | 4,007% |
| Gain YTD | -7.509 | -10.569 | 71% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.67 | 12.60 | 109% |
| Revenue | 5.39B | 139M | 3,880% |
| Total Cash | 88.3M | 6.1M | 1,447% |
| Total Debt | 1.23B | 37.2M | 3,293% |
GMS | PPIH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PPIH's Valuation (68) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GMS (72) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PPIH’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPIH (55) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPIH’s over the last 12 months.
PPIH's SMR Rating (39) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GMS (53) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PPIH’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
PPIH's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GMS (77) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that PPIH’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PPIH (94) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PPIH’s over the last 12 months.
| GMS | PPIH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 69% | 12 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 76% |
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BECN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BECN could also see price increases.
PPIH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PPIH and OC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPIH and OC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PPIH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPIH | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| OC - PPIH | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.60% | ||
| TREX - PPIH | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.44% | ||
| GMS - PPIH | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| BLDR - PPIH | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.93% | ||
| NX - PPIH | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||