Advertisement
GMS vs VRTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMS is a Hold and VRTS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VRTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- VRTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GMS (@Building Products) experienced а +31.88% price change this week, while VRTS (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was +0.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.58%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.
VRTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (+0.94% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
@Investment Managers (+2.07% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| GMS | VRTS | GMS / VRTS | |
| Capitalization | 3.88B | 1.72B | 226% |
| EBITDA | 593M | 434M | 137% |
| Gain YTD | 18.201 | -18.624 | -98% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.67 | 13.66 | 100% |
| Revenue | 5.39B | 841M | 641% |
| Total Cash | 88.3M | 340M | 26% |
| Total Debt | 1.23B | 2.18B | 56% |
GMS | VRTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 19 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 58 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 66 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 76 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VRTS's Valuation (19) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMS (68) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VRTS (58) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.
VRTS's SMR Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as GMS (66) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that VRTS’s stock grew similarly to GMS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as VRTS (76) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew similarly to VRTS’s over the last 12 months.
GMS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRTS (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that GMS’s stock grew significantly faster than VRTS’s over the last 12 months.
| GMS | VRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 69% | 17 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ERC | 9.31 | 0.03 | +0.32% |
| Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund | |||
| HYD | 49.95 | 0.10 | +0.21% |
| VanEck High Yield Muni ETF | |||
| PSEP | 40.00 | -0.07 | -0.17% |
| Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| EQIN | 44.30 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| Columbia US Equity Income ETF | |||
| FID | 19.06 | -0.04 | -0.21% |
| First Trust S&P Int Div Aristocrats ETF | |||
GMS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMS has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMS jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMS | 100% | +23.77% | ||
| BXC - GMS | 69% Closely correlated | +3.81% | ||
| BLDR - GMS | 66% Closely correlated | +7.46% | ||
| FBIN - GMS | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| IR - GMS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| MAS - GMS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
More | ||||
VRTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRTS has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VRTS jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VRTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRTS | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| IVZ - VRTS | 76% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| APAM - VRTS | 75% Closely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| TROW - VRTS | 74% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| JHG - VRTS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| STT - VRTS | 73% Closely correlated | +3.31% | ||
More | ||||