Ad is loading...
GMSEX vs MBXAX
GMSEX vs MBXAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSEX vs. MBXAX commentary
Mar 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSEX is a Hold and MBXAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXAX has more cash in the bank: 8.29B vs. GMSEX (159M). GMSEX pays higher dividends than MBXAX: GMSEX (8.03) vs MBXAX (1.66). GMSEX was incepted earlier than MBXAX: GMSEX (12 years) vs MBXAX (9 years). GMSEX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MBXAX (2.28). GMSEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. MBXAX (48.00). GMSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXAX: GMSEX (1000) vs MBXAX (2500). MBXAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.39 vs. GMSEX (-1.35). MBXAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.87 vs. GMSEX (-5.18).
| GMSEX | MBXAX | GMSEX / MBXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 2.28 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.28 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.754 | -1.246 | -141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 8.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.03 | 1.66 | 483% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.35 | 3.39 | -40% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.40 | 14.46 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.18 | 47.87 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...