Ad is loading...
GMSEX vs MBXIX
GMSEX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSEX vs. MBXIX commentary
Mar 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSEX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.29B vs. GMSEX (159M). GMSEX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: GMSEX (8.03) vs MBXIX (1.86). GMSEX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: GMSEX (12 years) vs MBXIX (9 years). GMSEX (2.50) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). GMSEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. MBXIX (48.00). GMSEX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBXIX: GMSEX (1000) vs MBXIX (2500). MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.66 vs. GMSEX (-1.35). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.79 vs. GMSEX (-5.18).
| GMSEX | MBXIX | GMSEX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 2.03 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.50 | 2.03 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.754 | -1.211 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 8.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.03 | 1.86 | 431% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.35 | 3.66 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.40 | 15.36 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.18 | 49.79 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers