Ad is loading...
GMSLX vs MBXFX
GMSLX vs MBXFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.29B vs. GMSLX (159M). GMSLX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: GMSLX (9.17) vs MBXFX (1.14). GMSLX was incepted earlier than MBXFX: GMSLX (12 years) vs MBXFX (4 years). MBXFX (3.03) is less costly to investors than GMSLX (1.40). GMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. MBXFX (48.00). MBXFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMSLX: MBXFX (2500) vs GMSLX (1000000). MBXFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.60 vs. GMSLX (-0.31).
| GMSLX | MBXFX | GMSLX / MBXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 3.03 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 3.03 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.000 | -1.398 | -143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 8.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.17 | 1.14 | 805% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 2.60 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | 11.75 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.18 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers