Ad is loading...
GMSLX vs MBXIX
GMSLX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSLX vs. MBXIX commentary
Jan 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSLX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. GMSLX (157M). MBXIX pays higher dividends than GMSLX: MBXIX (1.66) vs GMSLX (1.55). GMSLX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: GMSLX (11 years) vs MBXIX (9 years). MBXIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. GMSLX (20.00). MBXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMSLX: MBXIX (2500) vs GMSLX (1000000). MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.75 vs. GMSLX (2.49). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 36.71 vs. GMSLX (-6.34).
| GMSLX | MBXIX | GMSLX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.714 | 1.726 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 157M | 8.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.66 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 15.75 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.74 | 17.19 | -45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.34 | 36.71 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.92 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers