Ad is loading...
GMSLX vs MBXIX
GMSLX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSLX vs. MBXIX commentary
Mar 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSLX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.29B vs. GMSLX (159M). GMSLX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: GMSLX (9.17) vs MBXIX (1.86). GMSLX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: GMSLX (12 years) vs MBXIX (9 years). MBXIX (2.03) is less costly to investors than GMSLX (1.40). GMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. MBXIX (48.00). MBXIX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMSLX: MBXIX (2500) vs GMSLX (1000000). MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.66 vs. GMSLX (-0.31). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.79 vs. GMSLX (-0.18).
| GMSLX | MBXIX | GMSLX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.03 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.03 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.000 | -1.211 | -165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 8.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.17 | 1.86 | 492% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.31 | 3.66 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | 15.36 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.18 | 49.79 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.68 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers