Advertisement
GNRC vs ZWS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) vs. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GNRC has delivered year-to-date (YTD) returns of 66.8%, significantly outperforming ZWS's 13.1% amid recent market activity.
- GNRC's one-year return stands at 101.5%, compared to ZWS's 57.0%, highlighting stronger relative momentum.
- ZWS offers a dividend yield of 0.84% and lower beta (0.81) for stability, contrasting GNRC's higher volatility (beta 1.79) and no dividend.
- Recent ZWS Q1 earnings showed 11% organic sales growth and adjusted EBITDA margin expansion to 26.8%.
- GNRC approaches Q1 earnings with analyst expectations of revenue growth, bolstered by data center and industrial demand.
- Both stocks operate in industrials but diverge in focus: power generation for GNRC versus water solutions for ZWS.
Introduction
Investors and traders navigating the industrials sector often compare GNRC and ZWS for their distinct yet complementary exposures to infrastructure and energy trends. GNRC specializes in power generation solutions amid rising demand for backup systems, while ZWS focuses on water management amid sustainability initiatives. This stock comparison analyzes recent performance, business drivers, and market positioning, aiding those seeking growth-oriented plays or defensive industrials in volatile conditions.
GNRC Overview and Recent Performance
Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) designs and manufactures energy technology products, including residential standby generators, commercial industrial systems, and emerging home energy storage solutions. In recent market activity, GNRC shares have shown robust gains, trading near $226 with a market capitalization of $13.3 billion and a 52-week range of $109 to $241. Year-to-date returns reached 66.8%, driven by heightened demand for generators tied to power outages, data center expansions, and industrial applications. Sentiment has improved with analyst focus on upcoming Q1 earnings, projected at $1.04 billion in revenue and $1.33 earnings per share (EPS), alongside strategic pushes into AI-driven data centers. Higher beta (1.79) reflects volatility but aligns with growth potential in electrification trends.
ZWS Overview and Recent Performance
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) provides water dispensing, safety, and flow control products for commercial and residential markets, including faucets, sensors, and fixtures. Shares recently traded around $52.50, with a market cap of $8.8 billion and 52-week range of $33.50 to $53.70. Performance has been steady, with YTD gains of 13.1%, supported by Q1 results showing 11.4% sales growth, 11% organic increase, and adjusted EBITDA of $116 million (26.8% margin). Pricing actions and execution in institutional channels bolstered results, lifting shares toward yearly highs. Lower beta (0.81) and a 0.84% dividend yield appeal to stability-focused investors amid infrastructure spending.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing bots curated from over 350 AI trading agents that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—short-term scalping (15min-1D) to swing trades (up to 8D)—with impressive stats: annualized returns from 15% to 167%, win rates of 48%-88%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20 in leaders. Top performers target semiconductors (e.g., LRCX, ASML bots at +103% annualized), leveraged ETFs, and volatility plays, often using 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors for risk management. Visit the page to identify bots matching current market dynamics and your trading style.
Head-to-Head Comparison
GNRC and ZWS both anchor in industrials but diverge in models: GNRC leverages backup power and energy storage for cyclical growth, while ZWS emphasizes recurring water infrastructure needs. Growth drivers contrast—GNRC benefits from electrification and data centers, ZWS from conservation and commercial retrofits. Recent momentum favors GNRC with triple-digit one-year gains versus ZWS's steadier climb. Risk profiles differ: GNRC's elevated PE (84x) and beta signal higher volatility, offset by scale ($4.2B revenue); ZWS trades at 43x PE with superior margins (12% profit) and lower debt/equity (34%). Market sentiment tilts toward GNRC for upside catalysts, ZWS for defensive resilience.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently favor GNRC due to superior trend consistency, explosive YTD momentum, and alignment with high-growth sectors like data centers and power reliability. While ZWS offers stability post-earnings beat, GNRC's relative positioning suggests greater near-term probability of outperformance amid industrial recovery.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNRC is a Hold and ZWS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GNRC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GNRC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GNRC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GNRC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
GNRC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +9.42% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +4.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.
Reported Earning Dates
GNRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+1.96% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Specialties (+4.79% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| GNRC | ZWS | GNRC / ZWS | |
| Capitalization | 17.4B | 8.28B | 210% |
| EBITDA | 511M | 392M | 130% |
| Gain YTD | 116.719 | 7.261 | 1,607% |
| P/E Ratio | 92.36 | 40.36 | 229% |
| Revenue | 4.33B | 1.74B | 249% |
| Total Cash | 266M | 274M | 97% |
| Total Debt | 1.49B | 552M | 269% |
GNRC | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZWS's Valuation (56) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GNRC (85) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to GNRC’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNRC (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew significantly faster than GNRC’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's SMR Rating (62) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as GNRC (80) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to GNRC’s over the last 12 months.
GNRC's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (45) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that GNRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
GNRC's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (45) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that GNRC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
| GNRC | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
GNRC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNRC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNRC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNRC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNRC | 100% | +5.87% | ||
| FSS - GNRC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| SWK - GNRC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| HLMN - GNRC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| ZWS - GNRC | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ETN - GNRC | 50% Loosely correlated | +3.32% | ||
More | ||||
ZWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.12% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||