It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
GO (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.06%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.43%.
GO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.
The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.
@Specialty Stores (+1.34% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
GO | RUSHA | GO / RUSHA | |
Capitalization | 2.85B | 4.12B | 69% |
EBITDA | 215M | 737M | 29% |
Gain YTD | -10.122 | -7.290 | 139% |
P/E Ratio | 36.30 | 12.75 | 285% |
Revenue | 3.97B | 7.93B | 50% |
Total Cash | 115M | 184M | 63% |
Total Debt | 1.4B | 1.81B | 77% |
GO | RUSHA | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (24) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GO (73) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GO’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for GO (100) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew significantly faster than GO’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's SMR Rating (55) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GO (88) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GO’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as GO (64) in the null industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to GO’s over the last 12 months.
GO's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as RUSHA (22) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that GO’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
GO | RUSHA | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago78% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago69% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago69% | 1 day ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 6 days ago72% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago73% | 13 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago54% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RUSHA | 100% | +2.85% | ||
RUSHB - RUSHA | 87% Closely correlated | +1.66% | ||
AN - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.97% | ||
ABG - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
LAD - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | +2.02% | ||
PAG - RUSHA | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More |