GOAU
Price
$47.77
Change
+$0.15 (+0.31%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
282.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SIL
Price
$96.36
Change
+$0.16 (+0.17%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Net Assets
5.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOAU vs SIL

GOAU vs SIL Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) vs. Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)

Key Takeaways

  • GOAU employs a rules-based smart beta strategy focused on gold and precious metal miners, including royalty and streaming companies, while SIL passively tracks a silver miners index.
  • GOAU holds 28 securities with a 0.60% expense ratio; SIL holds approximately 39-40 securities with a 0.65% expense ratio.
  • GOAU provides broader precious metals exposure with significant weighting toward lower-operating-risk royalty firms; SIL offers concentrated exposure to silver mining operations.
  • Both ETFs target precious metals miners but differ in metal focus, with GOAU emphasizing gold and diversified precious metals and SIL centered on silver.
  • Structural differences in indexing methodology, holdings concentration, and cost create distinct risk and return profiles for investors seeking sector exposure.
  • Positioning depends on investor preference for gold-centric diversification versus pure silver mining beta in the current commodity environment.

Introduction

GOAU and SIL both provide targeted exposure to precious metals mining equities, yet they pursue different strategies within the sector. GOAU offers access to gold and broader precious metals producers and royalty companies, while SIL focuses exclusively on silver miners. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors seeking commodity-linked equity exposure amid fluctuating metal prices, industrial demand shifts, and macroeconomic uncertainty. The comparison highlights structural distinctions that influence long-term positioning.

U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) Overview

The U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF (GOAU) seeks total return by investing at least 80% of assets in precious metals companies, with at least 20% in gold-focused firms. It tracks the U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners Index using a rules-based, quantitative approach that emphasizes fundamental factors rather than pure market capitalization. The fund holds 28 securities, with notable allocations to royalty and streaming companies such as Wheaton Precious Metals and Franco-Nevada. Sector exposure centers on precious metals mining, primarily in Canada and Australia. GOAU maintains a gross expense ratio of 0.60% and operates as a non-diversified, open-end fund listed on NYSE Arca.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

The Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) seeks to replicate the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The passive strategy invests at least 80% of assets in securities of the index, which targets global companies engaged in silver mining and related activities. SIL holds approximately 39-40 securities and carries a total expense ratio of 0.65%. The fund is non-diversified and listed on NYSE Arca. Its structure emphasizes silver-specific mining operations, resulting in a more concentrated thematic profile compared with broader precious metals vehicles.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Precious metals mining equities respond to gold and silver price trends, industrial demand for silver in solar and electronics, central bank gold purchases, and macroeconomic factors including interest rates and geopolitical developments. Silver miners face additional sensitivity to industrial cycles, while gold-focused and royalty companies often exhibit relatively resilient margins during periods of elevated metal prices. Regulatory environments in major producing regions and capital expenditure trends among miners continue to influence sector fundamentals. Both ETFs operate within this commodity-driven landscape, where metal price volatility and supply dynamics shape investor interest.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, GOAU’s inclusion of royalty and streaming firms has contributed to a profile with potentially lower operating leverage than pure mining plays. SIL’s silver-centric holdings tie its behavior more closely to industrial silver demand and silver price movements. During periods of sector rotation toward precious metals, relative performance has reflected differences in metal exposure and holdings concentration. GOAU generally offers broader diversification across precious metals, while SIL delivers higher beta to silver-specific trends. Volatility differences arise from these structural distinctions, with SIL typically exhibiting greater sensitivity to silver price swings.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of preference to GOAU. The lower expense ratio, rules-based methodology incorporating royalty companies, and broader precious metals diversification contribute to a profile with potentially more consistent risk-adjusted characteristics relative to the pure silver focus and higher cost of SIL.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GOAU vs. SIL commentary
Sep 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOAU is a Hold and SIL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIL has more net assets: 5.12B vs. GOAU (283M). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than GOAU: SIL (15.533) vs GOAU (12.242). GOAU was incepted earlier than SIL: GOAU (9 years) vs SIL (16 years). GOAU (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than SIL (0.65). GOAU has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
GOAUSILGOAU / SIL
Gain YTD12.24215.53379%
Net Assets283M5.12B6%
Total Expense Ratio0.600.6592%
Turnover181.0027.57657%
Yield0.821.0479%
Fund Existence9 years16 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOAUSIL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GOAU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBFCX36.230.20
+0.56%
Neuberger Focus Trust
SBLYX75.82N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth I
JAMFX5.51N/A
N/A
Jacob Internet Inv
RTDSX14.81N/A
N/A
Russell Inv Multifactor US Equity S
TEGCX19.07N/A
N/A
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C

GOAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOAU has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOAU jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOAU
1D Price
Change %
GOAU100%
+0.32%
WPM - GOAU
94%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
OR - GOAU
90%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
FNV - GOAU
90%
Closely correlated
+2.05%
HMY - GOAU
89%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
DRD - GOAU
89%
Closely correlated
+1.66%
More

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
+0.17%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
OR - SIL
89%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More