GOCOF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.06M
MLGCF
Price
$0.35
Change
+$0.21 (+150.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOCOF vs MLGCF

Header iconGOCOF vs MLGCF Comparison
Open Charts GOCOF vs MLGCFBanner chart's image
Go Metals
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization1.06M
M3 Metals
Price$0.35
Change+$0.21 (+150.00%)
Volume$270
Capitalization1.24M
GOCOF vs MLGCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GOCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOCOF vs. MLGCF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOCOF is a Hold and MLGCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GOCOF: $0.04 vs. MLGCF: $0.35)
Brand notoriety: GOCOF and MLGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOCOF: 77% vs. MLGCF: 6%
Market capitalization -- GOCOF: $1.06M vs. MLGCF: $1.24M
GOCOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.06M. MLGCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOCOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GOCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GOCOF and MLGCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOCOF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLGCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOCOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLGCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOCOF is a better buy in the short-term than MLGCF.

Price Growth

GOCOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLGCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +144.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLGCF($1.24M) has a higher market cap than GOCOF($1.06M). MLGCF YTD gains are higher at: 145.121 vs. GOCOF (84.500).
GOCOFMLGCFGOCOF / MLGCF
Capitalization1.06M1.24M85%
EBITDA-1.95MN/A-
Gain YTD84.500145.12158%
P/E Ratio0.69N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash2.83MN/A-
Total Debt21.6KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOCOF vs MLGCF: Fundamental Ratings
GOCOF
MLGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9694
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOCOF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLGCF (90). This means that GOCOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GOCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (100). This means that GOCOF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GOCOF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (96). This means that GOCOF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

GOCOF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MLGCF (36). This means that GOCOF’s stock grew similarly to MLGCF’s over the last 12 months.

MLGCF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOCOF (100). This means that MLGCF’s stock grew significantly faster than GOCOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOCOFMLGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOCOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TNGX5.700.05
+0.88%
Tango Therapeutics
HIW31.350.24
+0.77%
Highwoods Properties
CHWY41.290.31
+0.76%
Chewy
GPUS1.370.01
+0.74%
Hyperscale Data Inc
CRGO2.27-0.03
-1.30%
Freightos Limited

GOCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOCOF has been loosely correlated with CAXPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GOCOF jumps, then CAXPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOCOF
1D Price
Change %
GOCOF100%
N/A
CAXPF - GOCOF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MLGCF - GOCOF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGPLF - GOCOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RSNUF - GOCOF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLI - GOCOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More

MLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLGCF has been loosely correlated with PPZRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLGCF jumps, then PPZRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLGCF
1D Price
Change %
MLGCF100%
N/A
PPZRF - MLGCF
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CAXPF - MLGCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOCOF - MLGCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ULTHF - MLGCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
EGPLF - MLGCF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More