It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GOGL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNAT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GOGL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NAT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
GOGL (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while NAT (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.52%.
GOGL is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
NAT is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2025.
The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.
GOGL | NAT | GOGL / NAT | |
Capitalization | 1.5B | 551M | 272% |
EBITDA | 491M | 92.4M | 531% |
Gain YTD | -14.968 | 6.537 | -229% |
P/E Ratio | 6.68 | 11.82 | 57% |
Revenue | 1.01B | 367M | 276% |
Total Cash | 247K | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 1.4B | 278M | 505% |
GOGL | NAT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GOGL's Valuation (5) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (11). This means that GOGL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.
GOGL's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Marine Shipping industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NAT (98). This means that GOGL’s stock grew somewhat faster than NAT’s over the last 12 months.
GOGL's SMR Rating (60) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as NAT (61). This means that GOGL’s stock grew similarly to NAT’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GOGL (63). This means that NAT’s stock grew similarly to GOGL’s over the last 12 months.
NAT's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Marine Shipping industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOGL (98). This means that NAT’s stock grew significantly faster than GOGL’s over the last 12 months.
GOGL | NAT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago79% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago74% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago66% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago78% | 7 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago62% | 4 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago89% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago69% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GVCAX | 10.44 | 0.05 | +0.48% |
Gabelli Value 25 AAA | |||
QICLX | 15.26 | 0.07 | +0.46% |
AQR International Multi-Style I | |||
RSRFX | 10.53 | 0.02 | +0.19% |
Reaves Infrastructure Fund Class Inst | |||
LMMRX | 29.37 | 0.04 | +0.14% |
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy R | |||
NBMBX | 16.62 | -0.04 | -0.24% |
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Adv |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOGL has been closely correlated with GNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOGL jumps, then GNK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
GOGL | 100% | -1.97% | ||
GNK - GOGL | 76% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
SBLK - GOGL | 73% Closely correlated | +1.44% | ||
SB - GOGL | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
HSHP - GOGL | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
SHIP - GOGL | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More |