GOLD
Price
$20.45
Change
+$1.21 (+6.29%)
Updated
Apr 11, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.21B
19 days until earnings call
LGDTF
Price
$0.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Capitalization
92.71M
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GOLD vs LGDTF

Header iconGOLD vs LGDTF Comparison
Open Charts GOLD vs LGDTFBanner chart's image
Barrick Gold
Price$20.45
Change+$1.21 (+6.29%)
Volume$62.38K
Capitalization29.21B
Liberty Gold
Price$0.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$149.43K
Capitalization92.71M
GOLD vs LGDTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GOLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOLD vs. LGDTF commentary
Apr 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLD is a Hold and LGDTF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GOLD: $19.24 vs. LGDTF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: GOLD: Notable vs. LGDTF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOLD: 119% vs. LGDTF: 77%
Market capitalization -- GOLD: $29.21B vs. LGDTF: $92.71M
GOLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.21B. LGDTF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $92.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLGDTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GOLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LGDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GOLD and LGDTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOLD’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGDTF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOLD’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LGDTF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOLD is a better buy in the short-term than LGDTF.

Price Growth

GOLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а -0.72% price change this week, while LGDTF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

LGDTF is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.31% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOLD($29.2B) has a higher market cap than LGDTF($92.7M). LGDTF YTD gains are higher at: 27.424 vs. GOLD (24.831). GOLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.21B vs. LGDTF (-25.3M). GOLD has more cash in the bank: 4.15B vs. LGDTF (15.8M). LGDTF has less debt than GOLD: LGDTF (246K) vs GOLD (5.22B). GOLD has higher revenues than LGDTF: GOLD (11.4B) vs LGDTF (0).
GOLDLGDTFGOLD / LGDTF
Capitalization29.2B92.7M31,499%
EBITDA5.21B-25.3M-20,579%
Gain YTD24.83127.42491%
P/E Ratio23.42N/A-
Revenue11.4B0-
Total Cash4.15B15.8M26,253%
Total Debt5.22B246K2,123,171%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOLD vs LGDTF: Fundamental Ratings
GOLD
LGDTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7671
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
74100
SMR RATING
1..100
7295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8415
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOLD's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for LGDTF (86) in the null industry. This means that GOLD’s stock grew significantly faster than LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLD's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LGDTF (100) in the null industry. This means that GOLD’s stock grew similarly to LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLD's SMR Rating (72) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LGDTF (95) in the null industry. This means that GOLD’s stock grew similarly to LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLD's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as LGDTF (47) in the null industry. This means that GOLD’s stock grew similarly to LGDTF’s over the last 12 months.

LGDTF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GOLD (84) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that LGDTF’s stock grew significantly faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOLDLGDTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GOLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LGDTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMC228.77-0.79
-0.34%
Marsh & McLennan Companies
POST115.58-0.47
-0.40%
Post Holdings
ALNT21.56-0.09
-0.42%
Allient
RBOT5.43-0.28
-4.90%
Vicarious Surgical
RC4.49-0.35
-7.23%
Ready Capital Corp

LGDTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGDTF has been loosely correlated with EQX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGDTF jumps, then EQX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGDTF
1D Price
Change %
LGDTF100%
-0.82%
EQX - LGDTF
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.84%
AEM - LGDTF
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.43%
GOLD - LGDTF
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
MAG - LGDTF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
PAAS - LGDTF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
More