GOLD
Price
$18.41
Change
+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
29.21B
2 days until earnings call
ORZCF
Price
$0.80
Change
+$0.03 (+3.90%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
323.07M
3 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GOLD vs ORZCF

Header iconGOLD vs ORZCF Comparison
Open Charts GOLD vs ORZCFBanner chart's image
Barrick Gold
Price$18.41
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Volume$19.72M
Capitalization29.21B
Orezone Gold
Price$0.80
Change+$0.03 (+3.90%)
Volume$66.81K
Capitalization323.07M
GOLD vs ORZCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GOLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOLD vs. ORZCF commentary
May 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLD is a Hold and ORZCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GOLD: $18.41 vs. ORZCF: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: GOLD: Notable vs. ORZCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOLD: 80% vs. ORZCF: 56%
Market capitalization -- GOLD: $29.21B vs. ORZCF: $323.07M
GOLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.21B. ORZCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $323.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOLD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileORZCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GOLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ORZCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORZCF is a better buy in the long-term than GOLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GOLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

GOLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.36% price change this week, while ORZCF (@Precious Metals) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.

ORZCF is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.42% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOLD($29.2B) has a higher market cap than ORZCF($323M). GOLD has higher P/E ratio than ORZCF: GOLD (23.42) vs ORZCF (9.67). ORZCF YTD gains are higher at: 81.510 vs. GOLD (19.446). GOLD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.21B vs. ORZCF (51.9M). GOLD has more cash in the bank: 4.15B vs. ORZCF (45.2M). ORZCF has less debt than GOLD: ORZCF (115M) vs GOLD (5.22B). GOLD has higher revenues than ORZCF: GOLD (11.4B) vs ORZCF (125M).
GOLDORZCFGOLD / ORZCF
Capitalization29.2B323M9,040%
EBITDA5.21B51.9M10,033%
Gain YTD19.44681.51024%
P/E Ratio23.429.67242%
Revenue11.4B125M9,120%
Total Cash4.15B45.2M9,177%
Total Debt5.22B115M4,542%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOLD vs ORZCF: Fundamental Ratings
GOLD
ORZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9559
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7928
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOLD's Valuation (13) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORZCF (53) in the null industry. This means that GOLD’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORZCF’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (95) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GOLD (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as GOLD (50) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ORZCF’s stock grew similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

ORZCF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (79) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that ORZCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GOLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERB5.680.28
+5.19%
Verb Technology Company Inc
AVA41.760.53
+1.29%
Avista Corp
WES36.33-0.05
-0.14%
Western Midstream Partners LP
LYEL0.46-0.01
-1.87%
Lyell Immunopharma
MERC3.91-0.30
-7.13%
Mercer International

ORZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ORZCF has been loosely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ORZCF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORZCF
1D Price
Change %
ORZCF100%
+4.68%
AEM - ORZCF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
NFGC - ORZCF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GOLD - ORZCF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
ISVLF - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ARMN - ORZCF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
More