GPHBF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.47M
TYNPF
Price
$29.59
Change
-$0.64 (-2.12%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
10.55B
Ad is loading...

GPHBF vs TYNPF

Header iconGPHBF vs TYNPF Comparison
Open Charts GPHBF vs TYNPFBanner chart's image
G6 Materials
Price$0.14
Change-$0.02 (-12.50%)
Volume$20.66K
Capitalization2.47M
Nippon Sanso Holdings
Price$29.59
Change-$0.64 (-2.12%)
Volume$7.4K
Capitalization10.55B
GPHBF vs TYNPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GPHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GPHBF vs. TYNPF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPHBF is a Hold and TYNPF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (GPHBF: $0.14 vs. TYNPF: $29.58)
Brand notoriety: GPHBF and TYNPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPHBF: 27% vs. TYNPF: 734%
Market capitalization -- GPHBF: $2.47M vs. TYNPF: $10.55B
GPHBF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $2.47M. TYNPF’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $10.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPHBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTYNPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GPHBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TYNPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYNPF is a better buy in the long-term than GPHBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPHBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GPHBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GPHBF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -42.00% price change this week, while TYNPF (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.74% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYNPF($10.6B) has a higher market cap than GPHBF($2.47M). GPHBF YTD gains are higher at: 198.354 vs. TYNPF (1.312). TYNPF has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. GPHBF (1.15M). GPHBF has less debt than TYNPF: GPHBF (86K) vs TYNPF (900B).
GPHBFTYNPFGPHBF / TYNPF
Capitalization2.47M10.6B0%
EBITDAN/A227B-
Gain YTD198.3541.31215,124%
P/E RatioN/A20.28-
RevenueN/A1.19T-
Total Cash1.15M155B0%
Total Debt86K900B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPHBF: Fundamental Ratings
GPHBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPHBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GPHBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NABEX12.32N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Abs Ret Multi-Mgr E
ERISX14.45-0.07
-0.48%
Parametric International Equity R
RGLAX24.35-0.28
-1.14%
American Funds Global Insight R-1
ESEAX34.66-0.53
-1.51%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq A
ABSIX20.44-0.52
-2.48%
AB Discovery Value I

GPHBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GPHBF and TYNPF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GPHBF and TYNPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPHBF
1D Price
Change %
GPHBF100%
-8.63%
TYNPF - GPHBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.09%
MTX - GPHBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
GVDNY - GPHBF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
GLGI - GPHBF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.04%
GNENF - GPHBF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More

TYNPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYNPF and CBT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYNPF and CBT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYNPF
1D Price
Change %
TYNPF100%
-2.09%
CBT - TYNPF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
OEC - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
AVNT - TYNPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
TROX - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
SKFOF - TYNPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More